Why are People Bad at Detecting Randomness? Because it is Hard

作者: Thomas L. Griffiths , Joseph Jay Williams

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: People often detect structure and patterns in data that is random. This difficulty accurately evaluating randomness manifests itself mistaken beliefs a fair coin has bias towards heads or tails, detection of causal relationships between variables randomly co-occur, observation illusory correlations continuous variables. A computational analysis an optimal reasoner’s performance on these three tasks suggests this does not arise simply because people have irrational disposition to see meaning randomness, but the underlying inference problem intrinsically hard– for both statistical human intuition. produced inherently ambiguous, which can also be by systematic process. An experiment reported provides evidence inferences about are difficult.

参考文章(7)
Dennis L. Jennings, Teresa M. Amabile, Lee Ross, Judgment under uncertainty: Informal covariation assessment: Data-based versus theory-based judgments Cambridge University Press. pp. 211- 230 ,(1982) , 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.016
David L. Hamilton, Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior University Microfilms International. ,(1981) , 10.4324/9781315668758
Loren J. Chapman, Jean P. Chapman, Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. ,vol. 72, pp. 193- 204 ,(1967) , 10.1037/H0024670
D. A. Redelmeier, A. Tversky, On the belief that arthritis pain is related to the weather Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 93, pp. 2895- 2896 ,(1996) , 10.1073/PNAS.93.7.2895
Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness Cognitive Psychology. ,vol. 3, pp. 430- 454 ,(1972) , 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3
Thomas L. Griffiths, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology. ,vol. 51, pp. 334- 384 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.COGPSYCH.2005.05.004