How Should We Spatially Distribute Dying and Dead Wood? 1
作者： Fred L. Bunnell , Elke Wind , Mark Boyland
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: We consider density and degree of aggregation dead wood. Cavity nesters as a group respond asymptotically to snag attain half their maximum at about 2.4 large snags/hectare. However, individual species show different responses, there is no apparent effect territoriality among smaller species. Dispersed retention trees snags strongly favors secondary cavity increases abundance above that found in mature or old-growth forests; patches favor primary nesters. Despite good operational biological reasons for patchwise wood, are negative effects on some
researchgate.net 参考文章(43)
Virgil E. Scott, Bird Response to Snag Removal in Ponderosa Pine Journal of Forestry. ,vol. 77, pp. 26- 28 ,(1979) , 10.1093/JOF/77.1.26
J.F. Franklin, J. C. Tappeiner, D.F. Berg, D. Thornburg, Alternative silviclutural approaches to timber harvesting : variable retention harvest systems Creating a forestry for the twenty-first century : The science of ecosystem management. pp. 111- 140 ,(1997)
Fred L. Bunnell, Isabelle Houde, Elke Wind, Barb Johnston, How Dead Trees Sustain Live Organisms in Western Forests 1 U S Forest Service General Technical Report PSW ust. ,vol. 181, pp. 291- 318 ,(2002)
R. William Mannan, Use of snags by birds, Douglas-fir region, western Oregon ,(1977)
Rebecca L. Thompson, Home range and habitat use of western red-backed voles in mature coniferous forests in the Oregon Cascades ,(1996)
Robert Elman, John O. Whitaker, The Audubon Society field guide to North American mammals Knopf : distributed by Random House. ,(1980)
Bret W. Tobalske, Raymond C. Shearer, Richard L. Hutto, Bird populations in logged and unlogged western larch/douglas-fir forest in northwestern Montana Res. Pap. INT-GTR-442. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 12 p.. ,vol. 442, pp. 1- ,(1991) , 10.2737/INT-RP-442
L. Gustafsson, T. Ingeloeg, J. Samuelsson, Dying and dead trees. A review of their importance for biodiversity Rapport - Naturvaardsverket (Sweden). ,(1994)