作者: Muhammad Zubair Afzal , Conrad M. Tobert , Emi Bulica , Sabrina L. Noyes , Brian R. Lane
DOI: 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2015.02.078
关键词:
摘要: Objective To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with urinary drainage using a modified technique for suprapubic catheter (SPC) placement those previously described SPC and urethral (UC) alone. Materials Methods We reviewed records 225 consecutive who underwent RARP by single surgeon. The most recent were contacted via telephone survey 86 responses (69%) received. Results After RARP, 174 had only UC (77%) 51 an placed (23%). Twelve 4-mL balloon (SPC-4), catheter-related complications occurring in four (33%). was to use 10-mL (SPC-10). Only 2 39 SPC-10 (5%) ( P = .03 vs SPC-4). Continence rates at 6 weeks 83% 82% SPC, respectively. Based on postoperative results 10-point scale, overall experience rated 8.9 ± 1.7 8.7 ± 2.3 respectively = .63). Mean bother 5.1 ± 3.0 4.6 ± 2.9 = .45). Conclusion provides safe option would prefer not have following equivalent perioperative outcomes. Modification published place standard 16F fewer complications.