Correspondence between psychometric and clinical high risk for psychosis in an undergraduate population.

摘要: Despite the common use of either psychometric or clinical methods for identifying individuals at risk psychosis, previous research has not examined correspondence and extent convergence these 2 approaches. Undergraduates (n = 160), selected from a larger pool, completed 3 self-report schizotypy scales: Magical Ideation Scale, Perceptual Aberration Revised Social Anhedonia Scale. They were administered Structured Interview Prodromal Syndromes. First, high correlations observed interview-rated psychotic-like experiences (rs between .48 .61, p < .001). Second, 77% who identified as having psychosis with measures reported least 1 clinically meaningful experience on Third, receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that scales can be used to identify which participants report positive symptoms. These results suggest mostly White undergraduate approach in an interview format are moderately strongly correlated experiences. The current provide baseline comparing