Playing hide-and-seek with the tobacco industry.

作者: Eric LeGresley , Monique Muggli , Richard Hurt

DOI: 10.1080/14622200412331328529

关键词:

摘要: Despite many peer-reviewed works that draw on tobacco industry documents have now been made public, questions remain about how complete a picture has emerged. We present conceptual framework identifies and evaluates efforts to conceal information. Widespread document destruction like in recent litigation Australia is just one of more than dozen prevent access, or at least timely documents. Industry range from small, locally employed initiatives company-wide tactics. Some efforts, such as using "oral only" procedures, scrambling telephone lines, involving lawyers scientific projects, are preemptive. Others seek deal with already existing by invoking bogus claims legal privilege, stipulating "read then destroy" for memos, rewriting problematic memos. That evidence concealment has, fact, found company archives attests the futility attempting control flow millions pieces paper among tens tbousands employees. However, researchers yet reveal full story: know industry's failures concealing information, but not its successes. The objective information per se, prevention public disclosure Exposing approaches provides greater insight into companies' intentions potential means stripping away concealment.

参考文章(21)
S. Chapman, The Cigarette Papers BMJ. ,vol. 312, pp. 1550- 1550 ,(1996) , 10.1136/BMJ.312.7045.1550
Monique E. Muggli, Jean L. Forster, Richard D. Hurt, James L. Repace, The Smoke You Don't See: Uncovering Tobacco Industry Scientific Strategies Aimed Against Environmental Tobacco Smoke Policies American Journal of Public Health. ,vol. 91, pp. 1419- 1423 ,(2001) , 10.2105/AJPH.91.9.1419
Stanton A Glantz, Deborah E Barnes, Lisa Bero, Peter Hanauer, John Slade, Looking through a keyhole at the tobacco industry. The Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA. ,vol. 274, pp. 219- 224 ,(1995) , 10.1001/JAMA.1995.03530030039032
Elisa K. Ong, Stanton A. Glantz, Constructing “Sound Science” and “Good Epidemiology”: Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms American Journal of Public Health. ,vol. 91, pp. 1749- 1757 ,(2001) , 10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1749
Monique Muggli, Richard Hurt, D. Douglas Blanke J.D., Science for hire: a tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. ,vol. 5, pp. 303- 314 ,(2003) , 10.1080/1462220031000094169
Peter Hanauer, John Slade, Deborah E Barnes, Lisa Bero, Stanton A Glantz, Lawyer Control of Internal Scientific Research to Protect Against Products Liability Lawsuits: The Brown and Williamson Documents JAMA. ,vol. 274, pp. 234- 240 ,(1995) , 10.1001/JAMA.1995.03530030054034
K M Cummings, C P Morley, J K Horan, C Steger, N-R Leavell, Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents Tobacco Control. ,vol. 11, pp. i5- i17 ,(2002) , 10.1136/TC.11.SUPPL_1.I5