The Case against the Privatization of Knowledge: Some Thoughts on the Myriad Genetics Controversy

作者: Giorgio Resta

DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-2032-0_2

关键词:

摘要: In the current debate on intellectual property, work of Karl Polanyi is frequently referred to by jurists, mainly in connection with story ‘old’ and ‘new’ enclosures. this paper I suggest that critical account rise ‘market economy’ provided can shed some light other important issues property law. particular, advance hypothesis paradigm ‘double movement’ might contribute a better understanding contemporary movements resistance against increasing commodification knowledge. Using Myriad Genetics controversy as paradigmatic example, reflect importance fundamental rights an institutional safeguard expansionary tendency law role judiciary guarantor social cohesion, endangered disruptive effects market rationality.

参考文章(35)
Carol M. Rose, The Comedy of the Commons: Custom, Commerce, and Inherently Public Property University of Chicago Law Review. ,vol. 53, pp. 105- 162 ,(1986) , 10.4324/9780429303227-9
Rebecca Eisenberg, Michael Heller, Can Patents Deter Innovation ,(1998)
Alexander Peukert, Güterzuordnung und Freiheitsschutz Springer. pp. 47- 84 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-3-540-69381-9_2
Saul Levmore, Property's Uneasy Path and Expanding Future The University of Chicago Law Review. ,vol. 70, pp. 181- 196 ,(2003) , 10.2307/1600553
Joann A. Boughman, Kyle M. Brown, The Geneticists' Approach to Bilski Journal of Business and Technology Law. ,vol. 6, pp. 59- ,(2011)
Gaëlle Krikorian, Amy Kapczynski, Access to knowledge in the age of intellectual property Zone Books. ,(2010)