EdTech Leaders’ Beliefs: How are K-5 Teachers Supported with the Integration of Computer Science in K-5 Classrooms?

作者: Nicol R. Howard

DOI: 10.1007/S10758-018-9371-2

关键词:

摘要: Educational Technology Leaders’ support of computer science teachers in K-5 classrooms are influenced by their beliefs about school-based program implementation criteria, available district-level support, and state mandates on the integration science. The researcher this study examines Computer Science teacher training five different Tech districts, to determine sustainable practices for schools. In order effectively integrate instruction, administrators decision-makers must be aware Leaders hold related process programs, specifically who facilitate curricula classrooms. Information reported may inform school-level, district-level, state-level decisions implementations.

参考文章(42)
Matthew J. Koehler, Punya Mishra, Kristen Kereluik, Tae Seob Shin, Charles R. Graham, The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. pp. 101- 111 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
Daniela Marcucci, Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion, & Keith Morrison (2011). Research methods in education (7a ed.). New York: Routledge. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies. ,vol. 2, pp. 201- 206 ,(2011)
Catherine C. Lewis, Lesson study : a handbook of teacher-led instructional change Research for Better Schools. ,(2002)
Mara SAELI, Jacob PERRENET, Wim M.G. JOCHEMS, Bert ZWANEVELD, Teaching Programming in Secondary School: A Pedagogical Content Knowledge Perspective. Informatics in education. ,vol. 10, pp. 73- 88 ,(2011) , 10.15388/INFEDU.2011.06
Michael de Raadt, Mark Toleman, Richard Watson, Introductory programming: what's happening today and will there be any students to teach tomorrow? australasian computing education conference. pp. 277- 282 ,(2004)
Sze Yee Lye, Joyce Hwee Ling Koh, Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming Computers in Human Behavior. ,vol. 41, pp. 51- 61 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.CHB.2014.09.012