La citación en tesis doctorales de biología y lingüística

作者: Susana Gallardo

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Objetivo: el objetivo del trabajo fue determinar diferencias disciplinares en uso de la citacion tesis doctorales. Metodologia: tal sentido, mediante un abordaje cualitativo se analizo forma y las funciones cita secciones “Introduccion” “Discusion”/ “Conclusiones” doctorales biologia linguistica. Por lado, examino lexico-gramatical citas distintas movidas retoricas cada seccion. otro desde una perspectiva pragmatica, indago lugar que ocupa contenido citado estructura ilocutiva. Resultados: observo correlacion entre funcion segmento textual apa-rece. En hubo mayor presencia como fundamentacion afirmacion conclusion. Los resultados sugieren los autores necesitan apoyar sus conclusiones no solo con resultados, sino tambien otros investigadores. Conclusion: creemos halladas ambas disciplinas vinculan concepciones epistemologicas una.Palabras clave: lenguajes especialidad, biologia, linguistica, generos discursivos, doctoral, citacion, discurso academico, ilocutivaObjective: To identity differences among disciplines in using citation. Methodology: Through a qualitative analysis we have studied the forms and functions of citations two sections (“Introduction” “Conclusions”) doctoral theses Biology Linguistics. On one hand, explored lexis grammar so to determine form different rhetorical moves. other from pragmatic point view determined place referred content illocutionary structure. Results: We observed correlation between function segment or movement which they appear. In discussion section thesis, citation played role enablement justification claims. These results suggest that authors biology need support their conclusions with evidence investigations. Conclusions: our opinion, are related epistemological conceptions. Key words: languages for special purposes, biology, linguistics, discursive genres, PhD citation, academic writing, structureObjectif: Identifier les e considerant Method: Ici nous etudions forme et fonctions dans deux “Conclusion”) des doctorat Biologie Linguistique. D’une part, le lexique-grammaire differents mouvements rhetoriques, d’autre d’un vue pragmatique, analysons lieu qu’occupe contenu cite structure illocutionaire. Resultats: Nous avons observe une fonction du ou elle apparaitu. aussi biologie, justifie habilite conclusions.

参考文章(22)
Antonia Dilamar Araújo, Práticas discursivas em conclusões de teses de doutorado Linguagem em (Dis)curso. ,vol. 6, pp. 447- 462 ,(2010)
Eugenio Coseriu, Lecciones de lingüistica general Gredos. ,(1981)
G. THOMPSON, Y. YIYUN, Evaluation in the Reporting Verbs Used in Academic Papers. Applied Linguistics. ,vol. 12, pp. 365- 382 ,(1991) , 10.1093/APPLIN/12.4.365
Yang Ruiying, Desmond Allison, Research Articles in Applied Linguistics: Structures from a Functional Perspective. English for Specific Purposes. ,vol. 23, pp. 264- 279 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00005-X
G. THOMPSON, Voices in the Text: Discourse Perspectives on Language Reports Applied Linguistics. ,vol. 17, pp. 501- 530 ,(1996) , 10.1093/APPLIN/17.4.501
Paul Thompson, Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses Journal of English for Academic Purposes. ,vol. 4, pp. 307- 323 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.JEAP.2005.07.006
David Bunton, The structure of PhD conclusion chapters Journal of English for Academic Purposes. ,vol. 4, pp. 207- 224 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.JEAP.2005.03.004
Kevin Ngozi Nwogu, The medical research paper: Structure and functions English for Specific Purposes. ,vol. 16, pp. 119- 138 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4