Two Sides of the Same Coin: Belief Revision and Enforcing Arguments
作者： Adrian Haret , Johannes P. Wallner , Stefan Woltran
关键词:
摘要:
ijcai.org
sci-hub.st 参考文章(26)
Gerhard Brewka, Ringo Baumann, Expanding Argumentation Frameworks: Enforcing and Monotonicity Results computational models of argument. pp. 75- 86 ,(2010)
Laurent Perrussel, Andreas Herzig, Sylvie Doutre, A dynamic logic framework for abstract argumentation principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. pp. 62- 71 ,(2014)
Peter Gärdenfors, David Makinson, Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge. pp. 83- 95 ,(1988)
Sven Ove Hansson, A Survey of non-Prioritized Belief Revision Erkenntnis. ,vol. 50, pp. 413- 427 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1005534223776
Fabio Paglieri, Cristiano Castelfranchi, Revising beliefs through arguments: bridging the gap between argumentation and belief revision in MAS ArgMAS'04 Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. pp. 78- 94 ,(2004) , 10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_6
Mukesh Dalal, Investigations into a Theory of Knowledge Base Revision. national conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 475- 479 ,(1988)
Marcelo A. Falappa, Alejandro J. García, Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Guillermo R. Simari, Review: on the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation Knowledge Engineering Review. ,vol. 26, pp. 35- 43 ,(2011) , 10.1017/S0269888910000391
Sven Ove Hansson, A Monoselective Presentation of AGM Revision Studia Logica. ,vol. 103, pp. 1019- 1033 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11225-015-9604-5
Adam Grove, Two modellings for theory change Journal of Philosophical Logic. ,vol. 17, pp. 157- 170 ,(1988) , 10.1007/BF00247909
Hans Rott, Preferential belief change using generalized epistemic entrenchment Journal of Logic, Language and Information. ,vol. 1, pp. 45- 78 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF00203386