Legal Fictions and the Essence of Robots: Thoughts on Essentialism and Pragmatism in the Regulation of Robotics
作者： Fabio Fossa
DOI:
关键词:
摘要:
philpapers.org参考文章(13)
Joanna J. Bryson, Robots should be slaves John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 63- 74 ,(2010) , 10.1075/NLP.8.11BRY
Joanna J. Bryson, Philip P. Kime, Just an artifact: why machines are perceived as moral agents international joint conference on artificial intelligence. ,vol. 22, pp. 1641- 1646 ,(2011) , 10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-276
Neil M. Richards, William D. Smart, How should the law think about robots Social Science Research Network. ,(2016) , 10.4337/9781783476732.00007
Ben Allgrove, Legal Personality for Artificial Intellects: Pragmatic Solution or Science Fiction? Social Science Research Network. ,(2004) , 10.2139/SSRN.926015
Ugo Pagallo, The Laws of Robots Springer Netherlands. ,(2013) , 10.1007/978-94-007-6564-1
S. M. Solaiman, Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy Artificial Intelligence and Law. ,vol. 25, pp. 155- 179 ,(2017) , 10.1007/S10506-016-9192-3
Jack M Balkin, The Three Laws of Robotics in the Age of Big Data Social Science Research Network. ,(2017)
Paulius Čerka, Jurgita Grigienė, Gintarė Sirbikytė, Is it possible to grant legal personality to artificial intelligence software systems Computer Law & Security Review. ,vol. 33, pp. 685- 699 ,(2017) , 10.1016/J.CLSR.2017.03.022
Joanna J. Bryson, Mihailis E. Diamantis, Thomas D. Grant, Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons Artificial Intelligence and Law. ,vol. 25, pp. 273- 291 ,(2017) , 10.1007/S10506-017-9214-9
Peter-Paul Verbeek, What things do Pennsylvania State Univ. Press. ,(2005)