The Netherlands: Oligopoly dynamics in the Dutch penitentiary system

作者: Kees de Groot , Sipco Vellenga

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36834-0_17

关键词:

摘要: The way the Dutch penitentiary system deals with religion reflects a relatively long history of religious diversity. Representatives organised denominations – or secular are allowed to participate in that gives chaplains (called ‘spiritual counsellors’) status as civil servants, while they directed by their own head chaplaincy (religious humanistic). This favours, even promotes, formation worldviews. Thus far, Roman Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Humanists, Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists have succeeded obtaining position this system. other religions also welcome chaplains, but not salaried state integrated judicial system; remain visitors special privileges. first Muslim entered prison 1990s. Therefore, ‘prison imam’ is less associated direct political motives countering radicalisation among detainees. Indirectly, regulates promoting distinct categories, such ‘Humanistic’ resulting from campaign for interests non-religious detainees ‘Muslim’ an umbrella term all different who affinity Islam, now considered belonging one ‘background community’.

参考文章(24)
J.D.W. Eerbeek, A.H.M. van Iersel, Positie en werkwijze van het justitiepastoraat in de inrichtingen Handboek Justitiepastoraat. Context, Theologie en Praktijk van het Protestants en Rooms-Katholiek Justitiepastoraat. pp. 101- 112 ,(2009)
Hans Schilderman, Van ambt naar vrij beroep Tijdschrift voor Religie, Recht en Beleid. ,vol. 6, pp. 5- 23 ,(2015) , 10.5553/TVRRB/187977842015006002002
Inger Furseth, Secularization and the Role of Religion in State Institutions Social Compass. ,vol. 50, pp. 191- 202 ,(2003) , 10.1177/0037768603050002005
Mohamed Ajouaou, Ton Bernts, Imams and Inmates: Is Islamic Prison Chaplaincy in the Netherlands a Case of Religious Adaptation or of Contextualization? International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society. ,vol. 28, pp. 51- 65 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S10767-014-9182-Y
Fenggang Yang, Oligopoly Dynamics: Consequences of Religious Regulation Social Compass. ,vol. 57, pp. 194- 205 ,(2010) , 10.1177/0037768610362417
Klaartje Klaver, Andries Baart, Attentiveness in care: Towards a theoretical framework Nursing Ethics. ,vol. 18, pp. 686- 693 ,(2011) , 10.1177/0969733011408052