Does Deliberation Promote Ecological Citizenship? The Convergence Hypothesis and the Reality of Polarization

作者: Jozef Keulartz

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92597-4_12

关键词:

摘要: This chapter will subject Bryan Norton’s well-known ‘convergence hypothesis’ to a critical assessment with view improve our understanding of the possibilities and difficulties environmental citizenship. I argue that Norton holds overly optimistic expectations regarding transformative force democratic deliberation. Firstly, consciously ignores role power relationships strategic negotiations in political will-formation. Secondly, also has too narrow on ethical discourse itself: he only focuses conceptions good life within single communities neglects plurality often incompatible between different communities. To illustrate inevitability bargaining one hand importance inter-communal tensions other, discuss wolf debate Finland started after country’s accession EU 1995.

参考文章(33)
William R. Caspary, Dewey on Democracy ,(2000)
Andrew Dobson, Citizenship and the environment ,(2003)
Luigi Boitani, John D. C. Linnell, Bringing Large Mammals Back: Large Carnivores in Europe Springer International Publishing. pp. 67- 84 ,(2015) , 10.1007/978-3-319-12039-3_4
Holmes Rolston,, , Rediscovering and Rethinking Leopold’s Green Fire Environmental Ethics. ,vol. 37, pp. 45- 55 ,(2015) , 10.5840/ENVIROETHICS20153714
Cass R Thaler, Richard H, Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness ,(2008)
G. Leistra, F.W.J. Keulartz, Legitimacy in European Nature Conservation Policy;Case-Studies in Multilevel Governance The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics ; 14. ,(2008)