作者: Bjørn Hofmann , Jan Helge Solbakk , Søren Holm
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-93872-1_1
关键词:
摘要: Express informed consent has become a standard requirement in research related to human beings, so also biobank research. However, it been argued extensively that this approach is inappropriate for and seriously hampers beneficial This chapter analyses see whether particular features require exceptional regulation. The conclusion drawn exceptionalism not defensible. Nevertheless, acknowledged certain types of challenge many the traditional approaches ethics alternative need be pursued. Four alternatives are explored: broad consent, confidentiality/privacy approach, submission researcher, conditioned authorization. Pros cons all them indicate contextual taken; one size does fit all. question “to or consent”, but how protect promote interests individuals contributing at same time as benefiting society future patients.