A Focused Ethnographic Study of Alberta Cattle Veterinarians’ Decision Making about Diagnostic Laboratory Submissions and Perceptions of Surveillance Programs

作者: Kate Sawford , Ardene Robinson Vollman , Craig Stephen

DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0064811

关键词:

摘要: The animal and public health communities need to address the challenge posed by zoonotic emerging infectious diseases. To minimize impacts of future events, disease surveillance will enable prompt event detection response. Diagnostic laboratory-based systems targeting domestic animals depend in large part on private veterinarians submit samples from cases a laboratory. In contexts where pre-diagnostic laboratory have been implemented, this group is often asked input data. This scenario holds true Alberta cattle participate Veterinary Surveillance Network-Veterinary Practice Surveillance, platform which non-disease case data are submitted. Consequently, understanding factors that influence these complex affect their participation programs foundational interpreting patterns reported laboratories engaging surveillance. A focused ethnographic study was conducted with ten Alberta. Individual in-depth interviews participants were recorded transcribed thematic analysis. Laboratory submissions biased toward outbreaks unknown cause, unusual mortality rates, issues potential herd-level implications. Decreasing value government support for testing contributed fewer over time. Participants willing surveillance, though collaboration necessary. Changes beef industry veterinary profession, as well producers themselves, present both challenges opportunities

参考文章(45)
Robert S. Fudge, John L. Schlacter, Motivating employees to act ethically: An expectancy theory approach Journal of Business Ethics. ,vol. 18, pp. 295- 304 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1005801022353
WM Andrew, A Brigham, D Kaustav, W Weng-Keen, None, Handbook of biosurveillance : Elsevier Academic Press,. ,(2006)
Levan Elbakidze, Bruce A. McCarl, Animal Disease Pre-Event Preparedness versus Post-Event Response: When is it Economic to Protect? Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. ,vol. 38, pp. 327- 336 ,(2006) , 10.1017/S1074070800022367
Mila C. Gonzalez, Kimberly A. Scott, Peggy Tsai, Marguerite Pappaioanou, Gerald T. Keusch, Sustaining Global Surveillance and Response to Emerging Zoonotic Diseases ,(2009)
Janice M. Morse, Lyn Richards, README FIRST for a User's Guide to Qualitative Methods ,(2002)
Robert M. Friendship, Maria del Rocio Amezcua, David L. Pearl, W. Bruce McNab, Evaluation of a veterinary-based syndromic surveillance system implemented for swine. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research-revue Canadienne De Recherche Veterinaire. ,vol. 74, pp. 241- 251 ,(2010)
H. Kloeze, S. Mukhi, P. Kitching, V. W. Lees, S. Alexandersen, Effective animal health disease surveillance using a network-enabled approach. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. ,vol. 57, pp. 414- 419 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1865-1682.2010.01166.X
Mette Vaarst, Stig M Thamsborg, Torben W Bennedsgaard, Hans Houe, Carsten Enevoldsen, Frank M Aarestrup, Arno de Snoo, Organic dairy farmers' decision making in the first 2 years after conversion in relation to mastitis treatments Livestock Production Science. ,vol. 80, pp. 109- 120 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00310-X
Jeanette Pope, Megan Counahan, Evaluating the utility of surveillance data to decision makers in Victoria, Australia. Sexual Health. ,vol. 2, pp. 97- 102 ,(2005) , 10.1071/SH04052
Edward L. Baker, David Ross, Information and surveillance systems and community health: building the public health information infrastructure. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. ,vol. 2, pp. 58- 60 ,(1996) , 10.1097/00124784-199623000-00016