Regulatory Capitalism, Accountability and Democracy

作者: Colin Scott

DOI: 10.1057/9781137349583_9

关键词:

摘要: Discussions of accountability in contemporary public life are commonly tied to notions power and democratic governance. A core narrative might suggest that is attributed elected governments legitimated, periodically, through elections. Within such a system the mechanism par excellence election which politicians can be removed from or given power. From narrative, number concerns flow. First, if we believe find favour because their promises then expect parliaments hold account for keeping promises. Second, notwithstanding fact elections, certain meta norms, often enshrined constitutional documents, not capable being changed within ordinary political legislative processes, seek ensure held complying with both judicial review other mechanisms, example parliamentary scrutiny bureaucratic oversight. Third, source legitimate processes election, should concerned when delegated by principals, legislation, agents monitored scope delegation.

参考文章(51)
Colin Scott, None, Reflexive Governance, Regulation and Meta-regulation: Control or Learning? De Schutter, O. and Lenoble, J. (eds.). Reflexive Governance: Redefining the Public Interest in a Pluralistic World. pp. 43- 66 ,(2010)
Anne-Marie Slaughter, A New World Order ,(2004)
Michael Moran, The British Regulatory State OUP Catalogue. ,(2003) , 10.1093/0199247579.001.0001
Julia Black, Critical reflections on regulation Research Papers in Economics. ,(2002)
Joseph Corkin, Constitutionalism in 3D: Mapping and Legitimating Our Lawmaking Underworld European Law Journal. ,vol. 19, pp. 636- 661 ,(2013) , 10.1111/EULJ.12019
Gatekeepers: The Anatomy of a Third-Party Enforcement Strategy Journal of Law Economics & Organization. ,vol. 2, pp. 53- 104 ,(1986) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JLEO.A036906