Decision-Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice

作者: Douglas W. Rae

DOI: 10.1017/S0003055400261467

关键词:

摘要: Once a political community has decided which of its members are to participate directly in the making collective policy, an important question remains: “How many them must agree before policy is imposed on community?” Only if participation limited one man does this become trivial. And choice decision-rules may seem only little less than rules world so largely governed by committees, councils, conventions, and legislatures. This paper about consequences these for individual values.Both oral written traditions theory have generally confined search optimal (or “best”) three alternatives. The rule consensus tells us that all direct participants be imposed. Majority-rule more half concur it initiative (as we call it), holds when any single participant approves it. These decision-rules—“everyone,” “most us,” “anyone”—are terribly important, but they cannot said exhaust available alternatives.The list alternatives just as long committee's roster. committee would ‘consensus,’ ‘majority’ ‘individual initiative’ possibilities. In n members, possible rules. Let decision-rule minimum number individuals (k) required impose policy.

参考文章(13)
E. H. Scott, James Madison, Journal of the Federal Convention ,(1993)
Neal Riemer, The Case for Bare Majority Rule Ethics. ,vol. 62, pp. 16- 32 ,(1951) , 10.1086/290803
Jean Jacques Servan-Schreiber, The American challenge ,(1968)
James Buchanan, Gordon Tullock, The Calculus of Consent Southern Economic Journal. ,vol. 29, pp. 101- ,(1960) , 10.3998/MPUB.7687
Herbert J. Kiesling, Potential costs of alternative decision-making rules Public Choice. ,vol. 4, pp. 49- 58 ,(1968) , 10.1007/BF01718797
Mancur Olson, Robert T. Golembiewski, The Logic of Collective Action ,(1965)
Robert Alan Dahl, A Preface to Democratic Theory ,(1956)
Gerald L. Thompson, Duncan Black, The Theory of Committees and Elections. Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 56, pp. 176- ,(1961) , 10.2307/2282351
Douglas Rae, Michael Taylor, Some Ambiguities in the Concept of Intensity Polity. ,vol. 1, pp. 297- 308 ,(1969) , 10.2307/3233942