Vaccination in England: a review of why business as usual is not enough to maintain coverage.

作者: Tim Crocker-Buque , Sandra Mounier-Jack

DOI: 10.1186/S12889-018-6228-5

关键词:

摘要: The vaccine system in England underwent radical changes 2013 following the implementation of Health and Social Care Act. There have since been multi-year decreases coverage many vaccines. Healthcare professionals reported finding new fragmented challenging. This study aims to produce a logic model evaluate available evidence for interventions improve coverage. We undertook qualitative document analysis develop using process evaluation methods. performed systematic review by searching 12 databases with broad search strategy identify studied conducted between 2006 2016 evaluated their effectiveness. then compared base model. analysed 83 documents developed describing core inputs, processes, activities, outputs, outcomes impacts vaccination alongside programmatic assumptions each stage. Of 9,615 unique articles, we screened 624 abstracts, 45 full-text included 16 studies: 8 randomised controlled trials quasi-experimental studies. Four studies suggest that modifications contracting incentive systems can increase coverage, but other programme inputs (e.g. human or capital resources) were not evaluated. multi-component intervention modified activities outputs from within GP practice part campaigns projects. Thus, potentially modifiable factors relating routine remain unexplored. Reminder/recall are under-studied England; payments adolescents may be effective; only two carer information. immunisation limited small number significant risk bias. Several areas important primary care unexplored as targets interventions, especially modification organisational management.

参考文章(62)
Douglas G Altman, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, David Moher, David Moher, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Medicine. ,vol. 3, pp. 123- 130 ,(2009)
Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, Aly Rashid, Mark Johnson, Louise Hazeiwood, Tracy Wilburn, Improving influenza and pneumococcal vaccination uptake in high-risk groups in Lincolnshire: A quality improvement report from a large rural county. Quality in primary care. ,vol. 11, ,(2003)
Michael Clarke, Carol Jagger, Ruth J Matthews, Antony J Arthur, Alison Hipkin, Dean P Bennison, Improving uptake of influenza vaccination among older people: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of General Practice. ,vol. 52, pp. 717- 722 ,(2002)
Brañas, Jordan, Fry-Smith, Burls, Hyde, Treatments for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a rapid and systematic review. Health Technology Assessment. ,vol. 4, pp. 1- 61 ,(2000) , 10.3310/HTA4270
Ingvil Saeterdal, Simon Lewin, Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren, Claire Glenton, Susan Munabi-Babigumira, Interventions aimed at communities to inform and/or educate about early childhood vaccination. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,(2014) , 10.1002/14651858.CD010232.PUB2
Antonio Giuffrida, Toby Gosden, Frode Forland, Ivar Kristiansen, Michelle Sergison, Brenda Leese, Lone Pedersen, Matthew Sutton, Target payments in primary care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,(1999) , 10.1002/14651858.CD000531
Julie C Jacobson Vann, Peter Szilagyi, Patient reminder and patient recall systems to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 2005, ,(2005) , 10.1002/14651858.CD003941.PUB2
Philip Gray, Ludovic Malfait, Quality assessment tool ,(2004)
Elkan, Kendrick, Hewitt, Robinson, Tolley, Blair, Dewey, Williams, Brummell, The effectiveness of domiciliary health visiting: a systematic review of international studies and a selective review of the British literature. Health Technology Assessment. ,vol. 4, ,(2000) , 10.3310/HTA4130
Anthony Scott, Peter Sivey, Driss Ait Ouakrim, Lisa Willenberg, Lucio Naccarella, John Furler, Doris Young, The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 9, pp. 1- 59 ,(2011) , 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.PUB2