Why Do Private Governance Organizations Not Converge? A Political–Institutional Analysis of Transnational Labor Standards Regulation

作者: LUC FRANSEN

DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-0491.2011.01519.X

关键词:

摘要: Voluntary governance arrangements focusing on responsible business behavior have proliferated over the past decades, and in many sectors of industry, different organizations now compete for participation. This private competition has negative consequences effective functioning these arrangements. In literature up until now, optimism prevails how a process policy convergence between may come about that would solve some problems arise because this competition. It is remarkable, however, one key industries referred to literature, garments virtually absent. article explains why so suggests next three existing approaches evolution possible organizations, actually fourth, pessimistic type should be introduced, taking into account perseverance political difference interest groups creating supporting

参考文章(16)
Jean-Christophe Graz, Andreas Nölke, Transnational Private Governance and its Limits ECPR Studies in European Political Science. ,(2007) , 10.4324/9780203939338
Charles Frederick Sabel, Dara O'Rourke, Archon Fung, Ratcheting labor standards : regulation for continuous improvement in the global workplace Social Science Research Network. pp. 1- ,(2000) , 10.2139/SSRN.253833
Kathleen Thelen, Contemporary challenges to the German vocational training system Regulation & Governance. ,vol. 1, pp. 247- 260 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1748-5991.2007.00013.X
James G March, Johan P Olsen, The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders International Organization. ,vol. 52, pp. 943- 969 ,(1998) , 10.1162/002081898550699
Steven Bernstein, Benjamin Cashore, Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework Regulation & Governance. ,vol. 1, pp. 347- 371 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1748-5991.2007.00021.X
Klaus Dingwerth, Philipp Pattberg, World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance European Journal of International Relations. ,vol. 15, pp. 707- 743 ,(2009) , 10.1177/1354066109345056