Public policy measures in support of knowledge transfer activities: a review of academic literature

作者: Anna Kochenkova , Rosa Grimaldi , Federico Munari

DOI: 10.1007/S10961-015-9416-9

关键词:

摘要: Despite the wealth of academic studies that analyze different policy measures and initiatives implemented by national or regional governments to support knowledge transfer from academia industry, scant systematization efforts seek integrate these disparate lines research. The systematic review on public in technology presented this article suggests a literature classification based two dimensions: type measure analyzed, focus study (i.e., design vs. impact assessment). On basis comprehensive review, we summarize lessons learned thus far, identify research gaps continue limit insights into for transfer, highlight directions further

参考文章(100)
Maurizio Sobrero, Paola Garrone, Mario Calderini, Corporate Governance, Market Structure and Innovation ,(2003)
I.M. Bodas de Araújo Freitas, R.N.A. Bekkers, M. van der Steen, V.A. Gilsing, Beyond the Demand-Side Perspective of Technology Transfer Policies: An Empirical Analysis of the Netherlands conference; Knowledge in space and time : economic and policy implications of the knowledge-based economy; 2008-04-07; 2008-04-09. ,(2008)
Lotta Väänänen, Public provision of business support services in Finland Research Papers in Economics. ,(2003)
Liana Marina Ranga, Koenraad Debackere, Nick von Tunzelmann, Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: A case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium Scientometrics. ,vol. 58, pp. 301- 320 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1026288611013
Albert N. Link, Donald S. Siegel, Mike Wright, The Chicago Handbook of University Technology Transfer and Academic Entrepreneurship Social Science Research Network. pp. 218- 244 ,(2015) , 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226178486.001.0001
David C Mowery, Richard R Nelson, Bhaven N Sampat, Arvids A Ziedonis, The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 Research Policy. ,vol. 30, pp. 99- 119 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6