Recovering from research: a no-fault proposal to compensate injured research participants.

作者: Elizabeth R. Pike

DOI: 10.1177/009885881203800101

关键词:

摘要: National advisory committees have considered the obligations owed to research participants in event of research-related injuries. These repeatedly concluded that injured are entitled compensation for their injuries, tort system provides inadequate remedies, and United States should adopt no-fault compensation. But because made no concrete proposals taken steps toward implementing compensation, continues rely on compensate participants. This Article argues recent legal developments a transformation global landscape make maintaining status quo morally indefensible practically unsustainable. Recent exacerbate longstanding difficulties associated with as method compensation; nearly every participant will difficulty recovering damages, certain classes participants--those federal those abroad--are prevented from altogether, resulting substantial unfairness. In past ten years, many countries substantially involved mandated systematic By not mandating has become moral outlier risks having its noncompliant embargoed by foreign ethics committees, thereby delaying important biomedical advances. examines alternative mechanisms offers proposal built systems already place. The proposed can be implemented around world help harmonize various national more equitably effectively whole. Language: en

参考文章(26)
Karen H. Rothenberg, Diane E. Hoffmann, Whose duty is it anyway?: the Kennedy Krieger opinion and its implications for public health research. Journal of health care law and policy. ,vol. 6, pp. 109- 147 ,(2002)
Robert Steinbrook, Compensation for Injured Research Subjects The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 354, pp. 1871- 1873 ,(2006) , 10.1056/NEJMP068080
J.V. McHale, Law and clinical Research--from rights to regulation? An English perspective. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. ,vol. 32, pp. 718- 730 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1748-720X.2004.TB01977.X
Seth W. Glickman, John G. McHutchison, Eric D. Peterson, Charles B. Cairns, Robert A. Harrington, Robert M. Califf, Kevin A. Schulman, Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 360, pp. 816- 823 ,(2009) , 10.1056/NEJMSB0803929
Charles Marwick, Compensation for Injured Research Subjects JAMA. ,vol. 279, pp. 1854- 1854 ,(1998) , 10.1001/JAMA.279.23.1854-JMN0617-2-1
Sabina Gainotti, Carlo Petrini, Insurance Policies for Clinical Trials in the United States and in some European Countries Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics. ,vol. 1, pp. 1- 8 ,(2010) , 10.4172/2155-9627.1000101
Jeffrey O'Connell, Tort versus no-fault: Compensation and injury prevention Accident Analysis & Prevention. ,vol. 19, pp. 63- 71 ,(1987) , 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90018-2
Steven. Joffe, Franklin G. Miller, Bench to Bedside: Mapping the Moral Terrain of Clinical Research Hastings Center Report. ,vol. 38, pp. 30- 42 ,(2008) , 10.1353/HCR.2008.0019