A study of the relationships between compensation package, work motivation and job satisfaction

作者: Jacques Igalens , Patrice Roussel

DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199912)20:7<1003::AID-JOB941>3.0.CO;2-K

关键词:

摘要: This study applied the theoretical framework based on expectancy and discrepancy theories to examine how elements of total compensation might influence work motivation job satisfaction. The principal dimensions that give rise distinct reactions among employees were examined. Two samples employees, 269 exempt 297 nonexempt studied separately in order identify differences reaction between these two groups. relationships compensation, satisfaction analysed by a structural equations model with LISREL VII. Proposals developed predict conditions efficiency cultural context employment France. three conclusions were: (1) under certain conditions, individualized can be factor motivation; (2) flexible pay neither motivates nor increases satisfaction; (3) benefits motivate increase Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

参考文章(70)
Edwin A. Locke, The nature and causes of job satisfaction Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. pp. 1297- 1349 ,(1976)
Victor Harold Vroom, Work and motivation ,(1964)
Barry A. Gerhart, George T. Milkovich, Employee Compensation: Research and Practice Research Papers in Economics. ,(1992)
Scott Snell, Arthur W. Sherman, George W. Bohlander, Managing human resources ,(1988)
K. G. Jöreskog, Dag Sörbom, LISREL 7 : a guide to the program and applications SPSS. ,(1989)
Richard G. Lomax, Randall E. Schumacker, A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling ,(1996)
Ruth Kanfer, Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. Consulting Psychologists Press. ,(1990)
Jiing-Lih Farh, Rodger W. Griffeth, David B. Balkin, Effects of choice of pay plans on satisfaction, goal setting, and performance Journal of Organizational Behavior. ,vol. 12, pp. 55- 62 ,(1991) , 10.1002/JOB.4030120105
Harold Lazarus, Edward E. Lawler, Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. ,vol. 25, pp. 451- ,(1972) , 10.2307/2521335