Characteristics of collaborative, interdisciplinary, and engaged research among graduate students in environmental conservation

作者: Adena R. Rissman , Lori Barrow

DOI: 10.1007/S13412-019-00553-0

关键词:

摘要: Research that is collaborative, interdisciplinary, and engaged with non-university partners has emerged as desirable for training graduate students to address complex issues in natural resource management. However, there a lack of understanding regarding why researchers may participate various forms collaborative research, especially among environmental conservation. We explored students’ research experiences the characteristics attitudes associated two specific types collaboration: interdisciplinary collaboration research. surveyed 56 who were affiliated University Wisconsin-Madison’s Integrative Graduate Education Training (IGERT) program on biodiversity conservation under novel ecosystems. investigated differences between different categories logistic regression decision tree analysis using classification (CRT) algorithm. Students more collaborators likely feel supported by an intellectual community view vital practice. be comfortable collaborating peers but less contributing their non-academics faculty concerned becoming policy or practice negatively impact them. Of ten instances which variables significant across three regressions, eight also identified CRT model. This suggests relatively high agreement statistical approaches. The had predictors should not viewed interchangeable. Further attention needed approaches enhancing experience

参考文章(61)
Daniel L. Kain, Cabbages--And Kings: Research Directions in Integrated/Interdisciplinary Curriculum. The Journal of Educational Thought. ,vol. 27, ,(1993)
Wayde Cameron Morse, Max Nielsen-Pincus, Jo Ellen Force, J. D. Wulfhorst, Bridges and Barriers to Developing and Conducting Interdisciplinary Graduate-Student Team Research Ecology and Society. ,vol. 12, pp. 8- ,(2007) , 10.5751/ES-02082-120208
Göran Melin, Pragmatism and self-organization Research Policy. ,vol. 29, pp. 31- 40 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00031-1
G. Fry, G. Tress, B. Tress, Defining concepts and the process of knowledge production in integrative research From landscape research to landscape planning : aspects of integration, education and application : proceedings of the Frontis workshop from landscape research to landscape planning: aspects of integration, education and application, The Netherlands 1-6 June 2004. ,vol. 12, pp. 13- 26 ,(2005)
Diana Rhoten, Andrew Parker, Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path Science. ,vol. 306, pp. 2046- 2046 ,(2004) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1103628
Richard A Olshen, Charles J Stone, Leo Breiman, Jerome H Friedman, Classification and regression trees ,(1983)
Geneviève Michon, Hubert de Foresta, Patrice Levang, Francois Verdeaux, Domestic Forests: A New Paradigm for Integrating Local Communities' Forestry into Tropical Forest Science Ecology and Society. ,vol. 12, pp. 1- ,(2007) , 10.5751/ES-02058-120201