A New Strategy for Selective Targeting of Progesterone Receptor With Passive Antagonists

作者: Junaid A. Khan , Abdellatif Tikad , Michel Fay , Abdallah Hamze , Jérôme Fagart

DOI: 10.1210/ME.2012-1328

关键词:

摘要: Currently available progesterone (P4) receptor (PR) antagonists, such as mifepristone (RU486), lack specificity and display partial agonist properties, leading to potential drawbacks in their clinical use. Recent x-ray crystallographic studies have identified key contacts involved the binding of agonists antagonists with PR opening way for a new rational strategy inactivating PR. We report here synthesis characterization novel class (APRn) designed from studies. The lead molecule, homosteroid APR19, displays vivo endometrial anti-P4 activity. APR19 inhibits P4-induced recruitment transactivation synthetic endogenous gene promoters. Importantly, it exhibits high selectivity respect other steroid hormone receptors is devoid any activity on target transcription. Two-hybrid immunostaining experiments reveal that APR19-bound unable interact either coactivators 1 2 (SRC1 SCR2) or nuclear corepressor (NcoR) silencing mediator retinoid acid thyroid (SMRT), contrast RU486-PR complexes. also agonist-induced phosphorylation serine 294 regulating transcriptional turnover kinetics. In silico docking based crystal structure ligand-binding domain show that, P4, does not establish stabilizing hydrogen bonds cavity, resulting an unstable ligand-receptor complex. Altogether, these properties highly distinguish RU486 likely its derivatives, suggesting belongs pure antiprogestins inactivate by passive mechanism. These specific open perspectives long-term hormonal therapy.

参考文章(75)
A. Guiochon-Mantel, P. Lescop, S. Christin-Maitre, H. Loosfelt, M. Perrot-Applanat, E. Milgrom, Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the progesterone receptor. The EMBO Journal. ,vol. 10, pp. 3851- 3859 ,(1991) , 10.1002/J.1460-2075.1991.TB04954.X
J A Kemppainen, M V Lane, M Sar, E M Wilson, Androgen receptor phosphorylation, turnover, nuclear transport, and transcriptional activation. Specificity for steroids and antihormones. Journal of Biological Chemistry. ,vol. 267, pp. 968- 974 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)48380-9
Leslie Bernstein, Epidemiology of endocrine-related risk factors for breast cancer. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. ,vol. 7, pp. 3- 15 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1015714305420
Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators, Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators, None, Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: Principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial JAMA. ,vol. 288, pp. 321- 333 ,(2002) , 10.1001/JAMA.288.3.321
M Lombès, N Binart, M E Oblin, V Joulin, E E Baulieu, Characterization of the interaction of the human mineralocorticosteroid receptor with hormone response elements. Biochemical Journal. ,vol. 292, pp. 577- 583 ,(1993) , 10.1042/BJ2920577
Shawn P. Williams, Paul B. Sigler, Atomic structure of progesterone complexed with its receptor. Nature. ,vol. 393, pp. 392- 396 ,(1998) , 10.1038/30775
Silvia I. Vanzulli, Rocío Soldati, Roberto Meiss, Lucas Colombo, Alfredo A. Molinolo, Claudia Lanari, Estrogen or antiprogestin treatment induces complete regression of pulmonary and axillary metastases in an experimental model of breast cancer progression. Carcinogenesis. ,vol. 26, pp. 1055- 1063 ,(2005) , 10.1093/CARCIN/BGI060
Eva Gonzalez-Suarez, Allison P. Jacob, Jon Jones, Robert Miller, Martine P. Roudier-Meyer, Ryan Erwert, Jan Pinkas, Dan Branstetter, William C. Dougall, RANK ligand mediates progestin-induced mammary epithelial proliferation and carcinogenesis Nature. ,vol. 468, pp. 103- 107 ,(2010) , 10.1038/NATURE09495
Suzanne E Wardell, Dean P Edwards, Mechanisms controlling agonist and antagonist potential of selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. ,vol. 23, pp. 9- 21 ,(2005) , 10.1055/S-2005-864030