Normative framework of informed consent in clinical research in Germany, Poland, and Russia.

作者: Florian Steger , Cristian Timmermann , Marcin Orzechowski , Katarzyna Woniak

DOI: 10.1186/S12910-021-00622-6

关键词:

摘要: BACKGROUND Biomedical research nowadays is increasingly carried out in multinational and multicenter settings. Due to disparate national regulations on various ethical aspects, such as informed consent, there the risk of compromises when involving human subjects research. Although Declaration Helsinki point reference for conduct humans, normative requirements may diverge from its provisions. The aim this examine consent biomedical Germany, Poland, Russia determine how each regulatory framework relates provisions Helsinki. METHODS For analysis, we conducted a search legal databases "Gesetze im Internet" "Internetowy System Aktow Prawnych" "ГAPAHT - Garant" Russia. was complemented by review secondary literature contained Google Scholar, PubMed, Polish National Library, eLibrary.ru. We have identified 21 containing clinical all three countries. content these documents systematically categorized analyzed. RESULTS countries shows strong commitment towards core principles envisaged Nevertheless, vary between differences range method language which information should be provided, through amount required disclosed, form documenting or withdrawal. In case vulnerable groups, are particularly visible. CONCLUSIONS can negatively impact international studies. Attention needs paid that flexibilities within not misused undermine protection subjects. Achieving global regional legislative harmonization might prove impossible. Such lack consensus reinforces significance agreements. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.

参考文章(24)
Linda K Larkey, Lisa K Staten, Cheryl Ritenbaugh, Renée A Hall, David B Buller, Tamsen Bassford, Barbara Rempfer Altimari, Recruitment of Hispanic women to the Women's Health Initiative Controlled Clinical Trials. ,vol. 23, pp. 289- 298 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00190-3
Gordon Marshall, John Scott, A Dictionary of Sociology ,(2005)
Jane Kaye, Edgar A Whitley, David Lund, Michael Morrison, Harriet Teare, Karen Melham, Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks European Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 23, pp. 141- 146 ,(2015) , 10.1038/EJHG.2014.71
Christine Grady, Enduring and Emerging Challenges of Informed Consent The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 372, pp. 855- 862 ,(2015) , 10.1056/NEJMRA1411250
Arja Halkoaho, Anna-Maija Pietilä, Mette Ebbesen, Suyen Karki, Mari Kangasniemi, Cultural aspects related to informed consent in health research A systematic review Nursing Ethics. ,vol. 23, pp. 698- 712 ,(2016) , 10.1177/0969733015579312
Nguyen Thanh Tam, Nguyen Tien Huy, Le Thi Bich Thoa, Nguyen Phuoc Long, Nguyen Thi Huyen Trang, Kenji Hirayama, Juntra Karbwang, Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: systematic review and meta-analysis Bulletin of The World Health Organization. ,vol. 93, pp. 186- 198 ,(2015) , 10.2471/BLT.14.141390
Laura B. Dunn, Milap A. Nowrangi, Barton W. Palmer, Dilip V. Jeste, Elyn R. Saks, Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: a review of instruments. American Journal of Psychiatry. ,vol. 163, pp. 1323- 1334 ,(2006) , 10.1176/AJP.2006.163.8.1323
Piret Veerus, Joel Lexchin, Elina Hemminki, Legislative regulation and ethical governance of medical research in different European Union countries Journal of Medical Ethics. ,vol. 40, pp. 409- 413 ,(2014) , 10.1136/MEDETHICS-2012-101282