A prospective evaluation of risk factors for infections from dog-bite wounds.

作者: Daniel J. Dire , David E. Hogan , Mark W. Riggs

DOI: 10.1111/J.1553-2712.1994.TB02442.X

关键词:

摘要: OBJECTIVE: To define risk factors for infections from dog- bite wounds and to model the probability of wound infection in patients presenting without who are treated as outpatients. METHODS: A prospective survey 769 consecutive dog-bite victims over a two-year period community hospital emergency department (ED) with an medicine residency program. standardized wound-cleaning protocol was used, which included debridement closure when indicated. Wounds were examined at follow-up. Variables analyzed demographic data (patient age, gender, race); information (wound type, number, location, depth); treatment (prior hospital, ED debridement, suturing, tetanus or rabies shots, antibiotics). RESULTS: There 734 complete records. These had mean age 13.4 +/- 13.2 years (range, 4 months 71 years). Infection evident 2.5% upon presentation. 704 (765 wounds) managed outpatients distributed follows: 26.7% head/neck, 20.4% hand, 15.7% arm, 10.1% trunk, 9.5% thigh, 15.9% leg, 1.7% foot. 32.9% puncture, 39.9% full-thickness, 60.1% partial-thickness wounds. Wound diagnosed 2.1% Of these requiring surgical sevenfold higher rate (p = 0.01). Patients more than 50 sixfold younger 0.05). Stepwise logistic regression found following variables be best predictors infection: full-thickness [p 0.006, odds ratio (OR) 6.23], female gender 0.048, OR 2.88), 0.024, 5.01). Combinations three predict rates 0.35% 23.9%. CONCLUSION: low seen this cohort on outpatient basis. depth, patient clinical that predicted likelihood developing infection. Future interventional studies should concentrate high probabilities Keywords: Animal Bites; Dog Bites Language: en

参考文章(35)
J. Skurka, C. Willert, R. Yogev, Wound infection following dog bite despite prophylactic penicillin. Infection. ,vol. 14, pp. 134- 135 ,(1986) , 10.1007/BF01643478
Ellie J.C. Goldstein, Jonathan G. Rest, Management of human and animal bite wounds. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. ,vol. 3, pp. 117- 126 ,(1985) , 10.1016/S0733-8627(20)30912-3
H. G. THOMSON, V. SVITEK, Small animal bites: the role of primary closure Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care. ,vol. 13, pp. 20- 23 ,(1973) , 10.1097/00005373-197301000-00004
Gary J Ordog, The bacteriology of dog bite wounds on initial presentation Annals of Emergency Medicine. ,vol. 15, pp. 1324- 1329 ,(1986) , 10.1016/S0196-0644(86)80620-5
Persi Diaconis, Bradley Efron, Computer-Intensive Methods in Statistics Scientific American. ,vol. 248, pp. 116- 130 ,(1983) , 10.1038/SCIENTIFICAMERICAN0583-116
D. A. Jones, T. N. Stanbridge, A clinical trial using co-trimoxazole in an attempt to reduce wound infection rates in dog bite wounds. Postgraduate Medical Journal. ,vol. 61, pp. 593- 594 ,(1985) , 10.1136/PGMJ.61.717.593
Michael Callaham, Prophylactic antibiotics in common dog bite wounds: A controlled study Annals of Emergency Medicine. ,vol. 9, pp. 410- 414 ,(1980) , 10.1016/S0196-0644(80)80153-3
Robert A. Rosen, The use of antibiotics in the initial management of recent dog-bite wounds. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. ,vol. 3, pp. 19- 23 ,(1985) , 10.1016/0735-6757(85)90005-1
Roxanne J. Guy, Elvin G. Zook, Successful treatment of acute head and neck dog bite wounds without antibiotics. Annals of Plastic Surgery. ,vol. 17, pp. 45- 48 ,(1986) , 10.1097/00000637-198607000-00009
Richard V. Aghababian, John E. Conte, Mammalian bite wounds Annals of Emergency Medicine. ,vol. 9, pp. 79- 83 ,(1980) , 10.1016/S0196-0644(80)80335-0