Normative Stakeholder Theory

作者: Abe Zakhem , Daniel E. Palmer

DOI: 10.1108/S2514-175920170000003

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Theories of management require normative justification; that is, they rely on some conception what is morally good, right, and just. This chapter examines the reasons for adopting a stakeholder theory rejecting once, perhaps still, “dominant” shareholder-centric approach. then surveys prominent “normative cores” are used to ground theory, Kantian, contractarian, feminist ethics, ethical pragmatism, moral obligations each approach generates. Some pressing questions raised with respect To extent ought we recognize imperfect shareholders? Are contractarian hypernorms substantive? How exactly should care about stakeholders, even an appropriate attitudinal response? Without commitment objective standards, how can pragmatists resolve conflict?

参考文章(54)
Daniel Engster, Care Ethics and Stakeholder Theory Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 93- 110 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-90-481-9307-3_5
Norman E. Bowie, A Kantian theory of meaningful work Journal of Business Ethics. ,vol. 17, pp. 1083- 1092 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1006023500585
Norman E. Bowie, Business Ethics in the 21st Century ,(2013)
Norman E. Bowie, A Kantian Approach to Business Ethics A Companion to Business Ethics. pp. 3- 16 ,(2007) , 10.1002/9780470998397.CH1
Scott Meikle, Aristotle's economic thought ,(1995)
Leo Strauss, Liberalism Ancient and Modern ,(1968)
Jacqueline de Romilly, The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens ,(1992)
Richard Rorty, Philosophy and Social Hope ,(1999)
John Dewey, Democracy and Education ,(1916)