Discourses of Roma Anti-Discrimination in Reports on Human Rights Violations

摘要: In an effort to understand the paradox between expansion of inclusion projects for Roma and their persisting exclusion, this article explores human rights practice in order grasp complexity meanings negotiated practice. way, we scrutinize whether there are limiting factors within inclusionary discourse itself. Specifically, analyze transnational judicial, political civil society actors’ reports on violations against Roma. A strong shared tendency frame terms discrimination can be discerned reports, demonstrating a dominant concept However, framing analysis underlying assumptions shows that not all three actors offer same solutions obtaining non-discrimination, which partly explain limited impact ostensibly inclusive anti-discrimination discourse. contrast, do share negative attribution responsibility nation states, but effectiveness discursive claim questioned. This illustrates how discourses actually quite complex so it substantiates need greater critical understanding such further research.