Effects of olfactory experience on the behaviour of the guinea-pig (Cavia porcellus)

作者: Carol Sue Carter

DOI: 10.1016/S0003-3472(72)80172-6

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Male and female guinea-pigs were reared in the presence of odours acetophenone (Ac), or ethyl benzoate (Eb) with no artificial odour present (N). The odour-choice behaviour latency approach to food was modified by olfactory experience. Males more responsive than females characteristics test situations sex differences responses Ac observed. Some males oestrous also affected odour.

参考文章(14)
William C. Young, Jerome A. Grunt, The pattern and measurement of sexual behavior in the male guinea pig. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. ,vol. 44, pp. 492- 500 ,(1951) , 10.1037/H0055063
Elliot S. Valenstein, Walter Riss, William C. Young, Sex drive in genetically heterogeneous and highly inbred strains of male guinea pigs. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. ,vol. 47, pp. 162- 165 ,(1954) , 10.1037/H0061296
E. Tobach, P. S. Gold, Behavior of the Guinea Pig in the Open-Field Situation: Psychological Reports. ,vol. 18, pp. 415- 425 ,(1966) , 10.2466/PR0.1966.18.2.415
Carol Sue Carter, John N. Marr, Olfactory imprinting and age variables in the guinea-pig, Cavia porcellus Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 18, pp. 238- 244 ,(1970) , 10.1016/S0003-3472(70)80033-1
WALTER RISS, ELLIOT S. VALENSTEIN, JACQUELINE SINKS, WILLIAM C. YOUNG, Development of sexual behavior in male guinea pigs from genetically different stocks under controlled conditions of androgen treatment and caging. Endocrinology. ,vol. 57, pp. 139- 146 ,(1955) , 10.1210/ENDO-57-2-139
John N. Marr, Lawrence G. Lilliston, Social Attachment in Rats By Odor and Age Behaviour. ,vol. 33, pp. 277- 282 ,(1969) , 10.1163/156853969X00116
George T. Avery Avery, Notes on reproduction in guinea pigs. Journal of Comparative Psychology. ,vol. 5, pp. 373- 396 ,(1925) , 10.1037/H0070185
Irving Zucker, Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of progesterone on sexual responses of spayed guinea pigs. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. ,vol. 62, pp. 376- 381 ,(1966) , 10.1037/H0023937