mHealth App for Pressure Ulcer Wound Assessment in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Validation Study

作者: Isabelle Laffont , Claire Jourdan , Anthony Gelis , Arnaud Dupeyron , Claire Palayer

DOI: 10.2196/26443

关键词:

摘要: Background Clinical evaluation of a pressure ulcer is based on quantitative and qualitative evaluation. In clinical practice, acetate tracing the standard technique used to measure wound surface area; however, it difficult use in daily practice (because material availability, data storage issues, time needed calculate area). Planimetry techniques developed with mobile health (mHealth) apps can be overcome these difficulties. Objective The goal this study was evaluate metrological properties free-access mHealth app, called imitoMeasure, assess ulcers. Methods This noninterventional, validation study. We included patients spinal cord injury presenting ulcer, regardless its stage or location. performed measurements ruler, we using transparent dressing measurement grid. Wound via app conducted twice by main investigator also coinvestigator determine validity, intrarater reproducibility, interrater reproducibility. Bland-Altman plots intraclass correlation coefficients were compute minimal detectable change percentage. Results Overall, 61 different ulcers included. reproducibility vs (considered method reference) good, 0.97 (95% CI 0.93-0.99), 0.99 0.98-0.99), 0.98 0.96-0.99), respectively, percentages between 17% 35%. Conclusions imitoMeasure had good validity It could an alternative assessment methods. Further studies larger more diverse wounds are needed. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04402398; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04402398.

参考文章(27)
Wysocki Ab, Thomas Ac, The healing wound: a comparison of three clinically useful methods of measurement. Decubitus. ,vol. 3, pp. 18- ,(1990)
Ivan Miguel Pires, Nuno M. Garcia, Wound Area Assessment using Mobile Application biomedical engineering systems and technologies. pp. 271- 282 ,(2015) , 10.5220/0005236502710282
Mehtap Bilgin, Ülkü Yapucu Günes, None, A comparison of 3 wound measurement techniques: effects of pressure ulcer size and shape Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing. ,vol. 40, pp. 590- 593 ,(2013) , 10.1097/01.WON.0000436668.79024.F9
Jan E. Lexell, David Y. Downham, How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. ,vol. 84, pp. 719- 723 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.PHM.0000176452.17771.20
Cees Lucas, Jody Classen, Deannine Harrison, Rob J. De Haan, Pressure ulcer surface area measurement using instant full-scale photography and transparency tracings. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. ,vol. 15, pp. 17- 23 ,(2002) , 10.1097/00129334-200201000-00009
Henrica C.W. de Vet, Caroline B. Terwee, Dirk L. Knol, Lex M. Bouter, When to use agreement versus reliability measures Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 59, pp. 1033- 1039 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2005.10.015
J. Shaw, C. M. Hughes, K. M. Lagan, P. M. Bell, M. R. Stevenson, An evaluation of three wound measurement techniques in diabetic foot wounds Diabetes Care. ,vol. 30, pp. 2641- 2642 ,(2007) , 10.2337/DC07-0122
Courtney H. Lyder, Pressure ulcer prevention and management. JAMA. ,vol. 289, pp. 223- 226 ,(2003) , 10.1001/JAMA.289.2.223
H. Beckerman, M.E. Roebroeck, G.J. Lankhorst, J.G. Becher, P.D. Bezemer, A.L.M. Verbeek, Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Quality of Life Research. ,vol. 10, pp. 571- 578 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1013138911638