The Revolution in Welfare Economics and Its Implications for Environmental Valuation and Policy

作者: John M. Gowdy

DOI: 10.2307/3654741

关键词:

摘要: Two research programs are brought together to contribute the growing body of work on alternatives standard welfare-based approaches environmental valuation and policy. The first is theoretical literature undermining “new welfare economics.” second endogenous preferences. Both these point necessity interpersonal comparisons in economics. This paper focuses (1) flaws use Potential Pareto Improvements as a policy guide, (2) “filtering” expressed preferences through axioms consumer choice, (3) role reformulation

参考文章(120)
Chris Jones, The "Boadway Paradox" revisited The Australian National University. ,(2002)
Peter A. Corning, Biological Adaptation in Human Societies: a ‘Basic Needs’ Approach Journal of Bioeconomics. ,vol. 2, pp. 41- 86 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1010027222840
Frank Ackerman, Lisa Heinzerling, Pricing the Priceless: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Protection University of Pennsylvania Law Review. ,vol. 150, pp. 1553- 1584 ,(2002) , 10.2307/3312947
John A. “Skip” Laitner, Stephen J. De Canio, Irene Peters, Incorporating Behavioural, Social, and Organizational Phenomena in the Assessment of Climate Change Mitigation Options Society, Behaviour, and Climate Change Mitigation. pp. 1- 64 ,(2000) , 10.1007/0-306-48160-X_1
John M. Gowdy, The Value of Biodiversity: Markets, Society, and Ecosystems Land Economics. ,vol. 73, pp. 25- 41 ,(1997)