Comparing the Convergent and Concurrent Validity of the Dynamic Gait Index with the Berg Balance Scale in People with Multiple Sclerosis

作者: Tapan Mehta , Hui-Ju Young , Byron Lai , Fuchenchu Wang , Yumi Kim

DOI: 10.3390/HEALTHCARE7010027

关键词:

摘要: Background: Recent clinical guidelines for adults with neurological disabilities suggest the need to assess measures of static and dynamic balance using Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) as core outcome measures. Given that BBS both balance, it was unclear whether either these instruments superior in terms its convergent concurrent validity, there value complementing DGI. Objective: The objective evaluate validity DGI by comparing performance two functional tests people multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: Baseline cross-sectional data on 75 MS were collected use this study from 14 physical therapy clinics participating a large pragmatic cluster-randomized trial. Convergent estimates between examined partial Spearman correlations each test lower extremity (Timed Up Go (TUG), Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Timed 25-Foot (T25FW) test) self-reported outcomes functioning general health 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Concurrent assessed applying logistic regression gait disability binary (Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) criterion measure). predictive ability models, reduced/parsimonious model including only second DGI, compared adjusted coefficient determinations. Results: Both strongly correlated overall well across PDSS strata correlations. In PDDS ≤ 2, difference convergence TUG -0.123 (95% CI: -0.280, -0.012). While finding statistically significant at type 1 error rate 0.05, not (Hommel's p-value = 0.465) after accounting testing corrections control family-wise rate. BBS⁻SF-36 correlation least moderate strata. However, DGI⁻physical score did have within 2. None differences significant. additional variation 6MWT explained when added 7.78% 0.6%, 15%). Conclusions: These exploratory analyses real-world settings neither is profoundly other validity. may any utility especially if focus mobility, but be useful goal provide insight endurance. Further research leveraging longitudinal trials quasi-experimental designs more information about usefulness BBS.

参考文章(36)
Nicholas G. LaRocca, Impact of walking impairment in multiple sclerosis: perspectives of patients and care partners The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. ,vol. 4, pp. 189- 201 ,(2011) , 10.2165/11591150-000000000-00000
Jack I. Williams, Sharon Wood-Dauphinee, Brian E. Maki, Katherine Berg, Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument Canadian Journal of Public Health-revue Canadienne De Sante Publique. ,vol. 83, ,(1992)
Calliope A. Dendrou, Lars Fugger, Manuel A. Friese, Immunopathology of multiple sclerosis Nature Reviews Immunology. ,vol. 15, pp. 545- 558 ,(2015) , 10.1038/NRI3871
Steve Amireault, Gaston Godin, Jason Lacombe, Catherine M Sabiston, None, The use of the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire in oncology research: a systematic review BMC Medical Research Methodology. ,vol. 15, pp. 30- 30 ,(2015) , 10.1186/S12874-015-0045-7
Davide Cattaneo, Alberto Regola, Matteo Meotti, Validity of six balance disorders scales in persons with multiple sclerosis Disability and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 28, pp. 789- 795 ,(2006) , 10.1080/09638280500404289
Guang Yong Zou, Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. Psychological Methods. ,vol. 12, pp. 399- 413 ,(2007) , 10.1037/1082-989X.12.4.399
Birk Diedenhofen, Jochen Musch, cocor: A Comprehensive Solution for the Statistical Comparison of Correlations PLOS ONE. ,vol. 10, pp. e0121945- ,(2015) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0121945
M. J. Hohol, E. J. Orav, H. L. Weiner, Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: a simple approach to evaluate disease progression. Neurology. ,vol. 45, pp. 251- 255 ,(1995) , 10.1212/WNL.45.2.251
Yvonne C Learmonth, Robert W Motl, Brian M Sandroff, John H Pula, Diego Cadavid, Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis BMC Neurology. ,vol. 13, pp. 37- 37 ,(2013) , 10.1186/1471-2377-13-37