MP53-17 CLINICAL VALIDATION OF THE 2005 ISUP GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM IN A COHORT OF INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH RISK MEN UNDERGOING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

作者: Ashley Ross , Stephania Bezerra , Sheila Faraj , Kasra Yousefi , Helen Fedor

DOI: 10.1016/J.JURO.2015.02.1711

关键词:

摘要: In 2005, the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) introduced several modifications to original Gleason system that were intended enhance prognostic power score (GS). The objective this study was clinically validate 2005 ISUP grading for its ability detect metastasis. We queried our institutional RP database men with NCCN localized intermediate high-risk disease undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) between 1992 and 2010 no additional treatment until time metastatic progression. A case-cohort design utilized. total 333 available samples re-reviewed GS reassigned per system. Cumulative incidence metastasis 0%, 8.4%, 24.5% 44.4% among specimens downgraded, unchanged, had one point increase two increase, respectively. hazard ratio raised in 8 9 compared 7 from 2.77 5.91 3.49 9.31, survival c-index increased 0.70 0.80 when re-graded at 5 years post RP. higher than (0.77 vs 0.64) predicting PCSM 10 regraded improved prediction PCSM. This validates updated using an unambiguous clinical endpoint highlights need reassignment according considering comparisons novel biomarkers clinicopathological variables archival cohorts. PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0146189 January 5, 2016 1 / 13 OPEN ACCESS Citation: Faraj SF, Bezerra SM, Yousefi K, Fedor H, Glavaris S, Han M, et al. (2016) Clinical Validation Grading System a Cohort Intermediate High Risk Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. PLoS 11(1): e0146189. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146189 Editor: Xin Gao, Sun Yat-sen University, CHINA Received: October 18, 2015 Accepted: December 14, Published: Copyright: © is open access article distributed under terms Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction any medium, provided author source are credited. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data within paper Supporting Information files. Funding: Kasra Elai Davicione employees GenomeDx Biosciences Inc. remaining authors have conflict interest declare. funder support form salaries [KY ED], but did not role design, collection analysis, decision publish, or preparation manuscript. specific roles these articulated ‘author contributions’ section.

参考文章(21)
Gleason Df, Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer chemotherapy reports. ,vol. 50, pp. 125- 128 ,(1966)
A E Ross, A V D'Amico, S J Freedland, Which, when and why? Rational use of tissue-based molecular testing in localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. ,vol. 19, pp. 1- 6 ,(2016) , 10.1038/PCAN.2015.31
Alan W. Partin, Bruce J. Trock, Edward M. Schaeffer, Ashley E. Ross, Michael H. Johnson, Kasra Yousefi, Elai Davicioni, George J. Netto, Luigi Marchionni, Helen L. Fedor, Stephanie Glavaris, Voleak Choeurng, Christine Buerki, Nicholas Erho, Lucia L. Lam, Elizabeth B. Humphreys, Sheila Faraj, Stephania M. Bezerra, Misop Han, Tissue-based Genomics Augments Post-prostatectomy Risk Stratification in a Natural History Cohort of Intermediate- and High-Risk Men European Urology. ,vol. 69, pp. 157- 165 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2015.05.042
Farzana A. Faisal, Debasish Sundi, Phillip M. Pierorazio, Mark W. Ball, Elizabeth B. Humphreys, Misop Han, Jonathan I. Epstein, Alan W. Partin, H. Ballentine Carter, Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Edward M. Schaeffer, Ashley E. Ross, Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature. BJUI. ,vol. 114, ,(2014) , 10.1111/BJU.12771
William C. Allsbrook, Kathy A. Mangold, Maribeth H. Johnson, Roger B. Lane, Cynthia G. Lane, Jonathan I. Epstein, Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist. Human Pathology. ,vol. 32, pp. 81- 88 ,(2001) , 10.1053/HUPA.2001.21135
William E. Barlow, Laura Ichikawa, Dan Rosner, Shizue Izumi, Analysis of case-cohort designs. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 52, pp. 1165- 1172 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00102-X
Donald F. Gleason, George T. Mellinger, , Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical Staging The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 111, pp. 58- 64 ,(1974) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2016.10.099
Athanase Billis, Marbele S Guimaraes, Leandro LL Freitas, Luciana Meirelles, Luis A Magna, Ubirajara Ferreira, None, The Impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Standard Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma in Needle Biopsies Journal of Urology. ,vol. 180, pp. 548- 553 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2008.04.018
Mahul B. Amin, Jonathan I. Epstein, Thomas M. Ulbright, Peter A. Humphrey, Lars Egevad, Rodolfo Montironi, David Grignon, Kiril Trpkov, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Ming Zhou, Pedram Argani, Brett Delahunt, Daniel M. Berney, John R. Srigley, Satish K. Tickoo, Victor E. Reuter, Best practices recommendations in the application of immunohistochemistry in urologic pathology: report from the International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. ,vol. 38, pp. 1017- 1022 ,(2014) , 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000254
Lars Egevad, Roberta Mazzucchelli, Rodolfo Montironi, Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology Modified Gleason Grading System Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. ,vol. 136, pp. 426- 434 ,(2012) , 10.5858/ARPA.2011-0495-RA