Information Behaviors in Higher Education Research Administration: Support for Collaborative Proposal Development Activities

作者: Christina Leigh Deitz

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Proposal development is a very complex process. While the existing river of instructional materials for proposal runs wide, body empirical research regarding this topic narrow, especially concerning information behaviors surrounding This study responds to need as an examination user-based method improving our understanding behaviors. A hybrid concept problem/situation adopted purpose characterizing problem situated in time and space, with institutions higher education (IHEs) faculty users or population interest study. asserts that awareness among – tied their situational positioning cognitive movements through situation can be developed inform design, facilitation collaborative activities development. Data were collected in-depth interviews twenty-seven (27) members from eleven (11) departments at four (4) schools colleges single research-intensive university. analysis led new dynamic, iterative model during primary contribution Additionally, presents questions had constraints they perceived relation proposal. Finally, discusses applicability potential benefits investigations improve education. The design results contribute both discussions within field administration.

参考文章(93)
Alberto Amaral, António Magalhães, The Emergent Role of External Stakeholders in European Higher Education Governance Higher Education Dynamics. pp. 1- 21 ,(2002) , 10.1007/978-94-015-9946-7_1
Karen E. Fisher, Joan C. Durrance, Maria Souden, Dana Walker, Community problem-solving framed as a distributed information use environment: Bridging research and practice. Information Research. ,vol. 11, pp. 3- ,(2006)
T. D. Wilson, Human Information Behavior Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline. ,vol. 3, pp. 49- 56 ,(2000) , 10.28945/576
Brenda Dervin, Patricia Dewdney, Neutral Questioning: A New Approach to the Reference Interview. RQ. ,vol. 25, ,(1986)
Pam Stephens, No Money? Write a Winning Grant Proposal. SchoolArts: The Art Education Magazine for Teachers. ,vol. 109, ,(2009)
B Dervin, From the mind’s eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. Qualitative Research in Information Management. pp. 61- 84 ,(1992)
Ingo Liefner, Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems Higher Education. ,vol. 46, pp. 469- 489 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1027381906977
Karl E. Weick, Sensemaking in organizations ,(1995)
Robert Porter, Why Academics Have a Hard Time Writing Good Grant Proposals. The journal of research administration. ,vol. 38, pp. 37- 43 ,(2007)