作者: A. Le Duigou , Y. Guan , Y. Amalric
DOI: 10.1016/J.RSER.2014.04.056
关键词:
摘要: Abstract The environmental issues in the transport sector are numerous and CO2 capture is not even plausible for vehicles at moment. This report describes a number of different emergent power train technologies (ICE, BEV, PHEV, FCEV) before providing an inter-comparison these within technical economic context. economical benefits discussed terms “Difference Total Cost Ownership” (DTCO) take: electric driving distances, energy (fuel, electricity, hydrogen) prices, batteries fuel cells costs. To simulate model uses several functional parameters such as battery range ‘range anxiety’ based on assumption one recharge per day. potential distances evaluated according to segmentation statistics daily trips. results show yearly mileages, well cost cells, together with their relative impact DTCO competitiveness vehicles. price remains high strong dependency battery׳s capacity, but savings can be considerable. electricity currently noticeably lower than petroleum-based fuels, which balances costs batteries. 50% or more LDV mileages electric-driven, limited ranges (ca. under 50 km). There stakes (competitiveness €215/kWh) lifetimes, while low (100 km our case) provide best margins. As regards FCEVs, hydrogen target pump should achievable (less €6.5/kg) reasonable gasoline prices (€1.7/liter pump) cell (€20/kW). taxes ICE efficiency gains will lead opposite impacts H2 pump.