Recruiting and consenting into a peripartum trial in an emergency setting: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals

作者: Julia Lawton , Claire Snowdon , Susan Morrow , Jane E. Norman , Fiona C. Denison

DOI: 10.1186/S13063-016-1323-3

关键词:

摘要: Recruiting and consenting women to peripartum trials can be challenging as the concerned may anxious, in pain, exhausted; there also limited time for discussion decision-making occur. To address these potential difficulties, we undertook a qualitative evaluation of internal pilot trial (Got-it) involving who had retained placenta (RP). We explored experiences views staff about information consent pathway used within pilot, order provide recommendations use future recruitment emergency situations. In-depth interviews were undertaken with (n = 27) participating (n = 22). Interviews analysed thematically. The accounts compared identify differences similarities their procedures. Women regarded having been straightforward facilitated by simplified (verbal written) summaries information. Both parties, however, conveyed discordant whether fully informed obtained. These perspectives appeared arise from different factors considerations impinging on women at recruitment. While placed emphasis on promoting understanding situation RP imparting clear succinct ways, highlighted experiential realities pre- post-birthing situations, how led quick decisions being made without full engagement risks participation. facilitate consent, suggested that should given during antenatal period, and, doing so, articulated rights-based discourse. Staff, voiced opposition this approach emphasising duty care all pregnant women, raising concerns causing undue distress majority individuals would not subsequently develop RP. By drawing upon involved same have shown they operate ethical paradigms. In argue benefits multiple when developing pathways (peripartum) trials. ISCRTN 88609453 .

参考文章(41)
Sue Ross, Adrian Grant, Carl Counsell, William Gillespie, Ian Russell, Robin Prescott, Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 52, pp. 1143- 1156 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00141-9
Alison M McDonald, Rosemary C Knight, Marion K Campbell, Vikki A Entwistle, Adrian M Grant, Jonathan A Cook, Diana R Elbourne, David Francis, Jo Garcia, Ian Roberts, Claire Snowdon, None, What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. ,vol. 7, pp. 9- 9 ,(2006) , 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9
Barney G. Glaser, The Discovery of Grounded Theory ,(1967)
K S Hoehn, A Nathan, L E White, R F Ittenbach, W W Reynolds, J W Gaynor, G Wernovsky, S Nicolson, R M Nelson, Parental perception of time and decision-making in neonatal research Journal of Perinatology. ,vol. 29, pp. 508- 511 ,(2009) , 10.1038/JP.2009.5
Philip J. Nickel, Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. ,vol. 27, pp. 245- 264 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S11017-006-9000-2
Jillian A. Wragg, Elizabeth J. Robinson, Richard J. Lilford, Information presentation and decisions to enter clinical trials: a hypothetical trial of hormone replacement therapy. Social Science & Medicine. ,vol. 51, pp. 453- 462 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00477-3