Optimum Teacher-Pupil Interaction for Pupil Growth"

作者: Robert S. Soar

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: BOTH hypotheses and conclusions relating teacher-pupil behavior to pupil growth tend be stated in simple, declara tive sentences, as: "Increased teacher indi rectness is associated with increased subject matter more favor able attitudes"; or, "Decreased criti cism favorable pu pil attitudes subject-matter growth." Yet probably the researcher would question whether these relationships could extended indefinitely, many class room teachers skeptical as soon hypothesis was stated. Probably both agree on such a statement "Up some point, increasing indirectness leads greater attitudes, but beyond that further increases lead decreased sub ject-matter less atti tudes." That is, there an optimal level of which than maximum possible criticism minimum possible. Once idea has been suggested, rather open-ended relationship, follows read ily "Do all learning tasks have same levels behavior?" An affirmative answer seem unreasonable face it, evidence supporting existence differences levels.

参考文章(10)
Wilfrid Joseph Dixon, BMD : biomedical computer programs University of California Press. ,(1965)
Donald M. Medley, Harold E. Mitzel, A technique for measuring classroom behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology. ,vol. 49, pp. 86- 92 ,(1958) , 10.1037/H0040378
Ardie Lubin, Chester W. Harris, Problems in measuring change American Journal of Psychology. ,vol. 78, pp. 324- ,(1965) , 10.2307/1420518
Harold Webster, A note on correcting personality scales for response sets or suppression effects. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 56, pp. 240- 240 ,(1959) , 10.1037/H0042174
Harold Webster, Correcting personality scales for response sets or suppression effects. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 55, pp. 62- 64 ,(1958) , 10.1037/H0048031
Alfred Castaneda, Boyd R. McCandless, David S. Palermo, The children's form of the manifest anxiety scale. Child Development. ,vol. 27, pp. 317- 326 ,(1956) , 10.2307/1126201
Philip J. Runkel, The Social-Psychological Basis of Human Relations Review of Educational Research. ,vol. 29, pp. 317- ,(1959) , 10.2307/1169260