Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.

作者: David A. Asch , M.Kathryn Jedrziewski , Nicholas A. Christakis

DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00126-1

关键词:

摘要: Objective. The purpose of this study was to characterize response rates for mail surveys published in medical journals; determine how the rate among subjects who are typical targets varies; and evaluate contribution several techniques used by investigators enhance rates. Methods. One hundred seventy-eight manuscripts 1991, representing 321 distinct surveys, were abstracted survey techniques. In a follow-up survey, 113 authors these provided supplementary information. Results. mean journals is approximately 60%. However, vary according subject studied tech- niques used. Published physicians have only 54%, those non-physicians 68%. addition, multivariable models suggest that written reminders with copy instrument telephone each associated about 13% higher than do not use Other techniques, such as anonymity financial incentives, Conclusions. Although rates, tend be moderate. survey's at best an indirect indication extent non-respondent bias. Investigators, journal editors, readers should devote more attention assessments bias, less specific thresholds. j CLIN EPIDEMIOL 50;10:1129-1136, 1997. 0 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.

参考文章(19)
LU Ann Aday, Designing and Conducting Health Survets. Journal for Healthcare Quality. ,vol. 20, pp. 41- ,(1998) , 10.1097/01445442-199805000-00015
ERIC B. RIMM, MEIR J. STAMPFER, GRAHAM A. COLDITZ, EDWARD GIOVANNUCCI, WALTER C. WILLETT, EFFECTIVENESS OF VARIOUS MAILING STRATEGIES AMONG NONRESPONDENTS IN A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY American Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 131, pp. 1068- 1071 ,(1990) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A115598
Francis J. Yammarino, Steven J. Skinner, Terry L. Childers, Understanding Mail Survey Response Behavior: A Meta-Analysis Public Opinion Quarterly. ,vol. 55, pp. 613- 639 ,(1991) , 10.1086/269284
Mike Brennan, Janet Hoek, The Behavior of Respondents, Nonrespondents, and Refusers Across Mail Surveys Public Opinion Quarterly. ,vol. 56, pp. 530- 535 ,(1992) , 10.1086/269343
David A. Asch, Nicholas A. Christakis, Different Response Rates in a Trial of Two Envelope Styles in Mail Survey Research Epidemiology. ,vol. 5, pp. 364- 365 ,(1994) , 10.1097/00001648-199405000-00020
Bernard C. K. Choi, Anita W. P. Pak, James T. Purdham, Effects of mailing strategies on response rate, response time, and cost in a questionnaire study among nurses. Epidemiology. ,vol. 1, pp. 72- 74 ,(1990) , 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00015
Allan H. Church, Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis Public Opinion Quarterly. ,vol. 57, pp. 62- 79 ,(1993) , 10.1086/269355
Maurice Schweitzer, David A. Asch, Timing payments to subjects of mail surveys: cost-effectiveness and bias. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 48, pp. 1325- 1329 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00040-2
Julie Yu, Harris Cooper, A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires Journal of Marketing Research. ,vol. 20, pp. 36- 44 ,(1983) , 10.2307/3151410
Robert M. Groves, Robert B. Cialdini, Mick P. Couper, Understanding The Decision to Participate in a Survey Public Opinion Quarterly. ,vol. 56, pp. 475- 495 ,(1992) , 10.1086/269338