Gene patents still alive and kicking: their impact on provision of genetic testing for long QT syndrome in the Canadian public health-care system

作者: Sarah E Ali-Khan , E Richard Gold

DOI: 10.1038/GIM.2017.43

关键词:

摘要: PurposeAlthough the Supreme Court of United States limited their availability in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, gene patents remain important around world. We examine situation Canada, where continue to exist, light recent litigation relating familial long QT syndrome (LQTS).MethodsWe conducted in-depth semistructured interviews with 25 stakeholders across five Canadian provinces and supplemented this a case analysis litigation.ResultsThe majority LQTS testing was carried out outside Canada. Rising costs prompted several attempt repatriate testing. However, stymied efforts, particularly more centralized, increasing lowering innovation. It context that hospital launched test against patents, resulting novel agreement free hospitals from effects patents.ConclusionOur reveals rapidly evolving genetic provision landscape under pressure strained budgets poor collaboration. The resulted blueprint public use throughout Canada's health-care system, but it will only have value if governments are proactive its use.

参考文章(21)
S. Christian, P. Blumenschein, M. Lilley, An assessment of Canadian systems for triaging referred out genetic testing. Clinical Genetics. ,vol. 88, pp. 90- 94 ,(2015) , 10.1111/CGE.12435
M Lilley, S Christian, P Blumenschein, S Chan, M Somerville, A centralized approach to out-of-province genetic testing leads to cost savings: the Alberta experience Clinical Genetics. ,vol. 84, pp. 373- 377 ,(2013) , 10.1111/CGE.12077
E Richard Gold, Julia Carbone, Myriad Genetics: In the eye of the policy storm Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 12, pp. S39- S70 ,(2010) , 10.1097/GIM.0B013E3181D72661
R. E. Gold, R. Cook-Deegan, T. Bubela, AMP v. Myriad: a surgical strike on Blockbuster business models. Science Translational Medicine. ,vol. 5, ,(2013) , 10.1126/SCITRANSLMED.3006849
Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology Qualitative Research in Psychology. ,vol. 3, pp. 77- 101 ,(2006) , 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
Alethea Adair, Robyn Hyde-Lay, Edna Einsiedel, Timothy Caulfield, Technology assessment and resource allocation for predictive genetic testing: A study of the perspectives of Canadian genetic health care providers BMC Medical Ethics. ,vol. 10, pp. 6- 6 ,(2009) , 10.1186/1472-6939-10-6
Robert Cook-Deegan, John M Conley, James P Evans, Daniel Vorhaus, The next controversy in genetic testing: clinical data as trade secrets? European Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 21, pp. 585- 588 ,(2013) , 10.1038/EJHG.2012.217
Naomi Hawkins, The impact of human gene patents on genetic testing in the United Kingdom Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 13, pp. 320- 324 ,(2011) , 10.1097/GIM.0B013E3181FC50BC
Isabelle Huys, Gert Matthijs, Geertrui Van Overwalle, The fate and future of patents on human genes and genetic diagnostic methods Nature Reviews Genetics. ,vol. 13, pp. 441- 448 ,(2012) , 10.1038/NRG3255