Quality assurance and morbidity and mortality conference

作者: Jon S. Thompson , Mary A. Prior

DOI: 10.1016/0022-4804(92)90285-8

关键词:

摘要: Many surgeons assert that Morbidity and Mortality (M & M) conference in itself assures an effective quality assurance (QA) program. Recent emphasis on QA other sectors has resulted processes for evaluating of care. The goals programs are to identify adverse patient care events, relate these specific physicians use this information improve care, credentialing privileging physicians. Our aim was determine the role surgical M a program which also includes occurrence screening, wound infection surveillance, case review. weekly is discussion identified complications deaths submitted voluntarily by surgeons. During 2-year period 5755 procedures were associated with 255 82 deaths. Only 74% events 35% cases review, 54% infections had been conference. Seventy-four percent residents 33% staff present at when their discussed. Level (I, accepted practice; II, may have managed differently; III, would differently) assessed each complication peer review medical record screening. assignment level similar either process (I = 49, II 11, III 2, vs I 44, 16, r 0.7405, P < 0.005). remains important component overall but does not meet all goals. There excellent agreement between assigned compared record. However, many via reported In our experience, often

参考文章(19)
Campbell Wb, Surgical morbidity and mortality meetings. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. ,vol. 70, pp. 363- 365 ,(1988)
Lorrin M. Koran, The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and Judgments New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 293, pp. 642- 646 ,(1975) , 10.1056/NEJM197509252931307
Troyen A. Brennan, Identification of Adverse Events Occurring during Hospitalization Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 112, pp. 221- 226 ,(1990) , 10.7326/0003-4819-112-3-221
William J. Brady, Deborah C. Hissa, Mark McConnell, Robert G. Wones, Should physicians perform their own quality assurance audits? Journal of General Internal Medicine. ,vol. 3, pp. 560- 565 ,(1988) , 10.1007/BF02596100
Paul J. Sanazaro, A Critique of the Use of Generic Screening in Quality Assessment JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 265, pp. 1977- 1981 ,(1991) , 10.1001/JAMA.1991.03460150081028
Robert E. Condon, Effectiveness of a Surgical Wound Surveillance Program Archives of Surgery. ,vol. 118, pp. 303- 307 ,(1983) , 10.1001/ARCHSURG.1983.01390030035006
Wah Ting Wong, Quality assurance in surgical practice through auditing. American Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 139, pp. 669- 672 ,(1980) , 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90360-8
Mary M. Olson, Continuous, 10-Year Wound Infection Surveillance Archives of Surgery. ,vol. 125, pp. 794- 803 ,(1990) , 10.1001/ARCHSURG.1990.01410180120020
Robert A. Caplan, Effect of Outcome on Physician Judgments of Appropriateness of Care JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 265, pp. 1957- 1960 ,(1991) , 10.1001/JAMA.1991.03460150061024
Albert W Wu, Susan Folkman, Stephen J McPhee, Bernard Lo, Do House Officers Learn From Their Mistakes? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 265, pp. 2089- 2094 ,(1991) , 10.1001/JAMA.1991.03460160067031