Space jam: Are niche parties strategic or looney?

作者: Mathias Wessel Tromborg

DOI: 10.1016/J.ELECTSTUD.2015.09.001

关键词:

摘要: There is an emerging consensus that niche parties are fundamentally different from mainstream because do not moderate their policy positions strategically. However, there theoretical reason to believe have electoral incentive shift in the same direction as proximate them most salient space. This paper examines whether respond such incentives, using data on government coalitions Parliament and Government Composition Database, party behavior Comparative Manifesto Project 17 Western style democracies. The results suggest tend strategically perceived of parties, especially dimension.

参考文章(27)
James M. Enelow, The spatial theory of voting ,(1984)
Bernard Grofman, Samuel Merrill Iii, James F. Adams, A unified theory of party competition ,(2005)
Ian Budge, Judith Bara, Andrea Volkens, Eric Tanenbaum, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998 ,(2001)
Tjitske Akkerman, Matthijs Rooduijn, Pariahs or Partners? Inclusion and Exclusion of Radical Right Parties and the Effects on Their Policy Positions Political Studies. ,vol. 63, pp. 1140- 1157 ,(2015) , 10.1111/1467-9248.12146
Will Lowe, Kenneth Benoit, Slava Jankin Mikhaylov, Michael Laver, Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts Legislative Studies Quarterly. ,vol. 36, pp. 123- 155 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1939-9162.2010.00006.X
Markus Wagner, Defining and measuring niche parties Party Politics. ,vol. 18, pp. 845- 864 ,(2012) , 10.1177/1354068810393267
Anthony Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy ,(1957)
Andre Blais, Donald Blake, Stephane Dion, Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies American Journal of Political Science. ,vol. 37, pp. 40- ,(1993) , 10.2307/2111523