Resolving the conflict between driven-grouse shooting and conservation of hen harriers

作者: Patrick S. Thompson , Arjun Amar , David G. Hoccom , Jeff Knott , Jeremy D. Wilson

DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2009.01687.X

关键词:

摘要: Summary 1. Birds of prey and driven-grouse shooting are at the centre a long-standing human–wildlife conflict. Hen harrier predation can reduce grouse bags, limit populations cause economic losses. Despite legal protection, hen numbers severely depleted on drivengrouse moors. 2. In limited trials, provision supplementary food to harriers greatly reduced their predatory impact young grouse, but did not result in higher densities for shooting. Consequently, moor managers have failed adopt technique. 3. A recent Forum paper has called trial ‘population ceiling scheme’ harriers, arguing that this represents best way increase Once exceed agreed ceiling, excess would be translocated other suitable habitat. 4. Whilst ‘ceiling’ scheme might work, it difficult implement we believe approaches population recovery should tested first. 5. While makes an important contribution tosome rural communities, some owners receive considerable sums public money. this, many moors poor condition, ecosystem services they supply may risk from both climate change current management practices, decline. The socio-economic environmental implications alternative models need urgent examination. 6. Synthesis applications. If is only viable when birds routinely disturbed killed, then question legitimacy as sustainable land use. Moorland consider more broadly practices 21st century.

参考文章(23)
P. V. Grice, A. D. Evans, J. D. Wilson, Bird Conservation and Agriculture ,(2009)
S. M. Redpath, S. J. Thirgood, Birds of prey and red grouse Stationery Office. ,(1997)
A. R. YALLOP, J. I. THACKER, G. THOMAS, M. STEPHENS, B. CLUTTERBUCK, T. BREWER, C. A. D. SANNIER, The extent and intensity of management burning in the English uplands Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 43, pp. 1138- 1148 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2006.01222.X
A. Foster, J. Davidson, M. Russell, J. Ruddock, Conserving biodiversity: the UK approach. Conserving biodiversity: the UK approach.. ,(2007)
D.P Whitfield, A.H Fielding, D.R.A Mcleod, P.F Haworth, Modelling the effects of persecution on the population dynamics of golden eagles in Scotland Biological Conservation. ,vol. 119, pp. 319- 333 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2003.11.015
Kirsty Park, Andrew Barton, Peter A Robertson, Loss of heather moorland in the Scottish uplands: the role of red grouse management Wildlife Biology. ,vol. 7, pp. 37- 42 ,(2001)
Stephen M. Redpath, Simon J. Thirgood, Fiona M. Leckie, Does supplementary feeding reduce predation of red grouse by hen harriers Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 38, pp. 1157- 1168 ,(2001) , 10.1046/J.0021-8901.2001.00683.X
HG Orr, RL Wilby, M McKenzie Hedger, I Brown, Climate change in the uplands: a UK perspective on safeguarding regulatory ecosystem services. Climate Research. ,vol. 37, pp. 77- 98 ,(2008) , 10.3354/CR00754
D.B.A. Thompson, A.J. MacDonald, J.H. Marsden, C.A. Galbraith, Upland heather moorland in Great Britain: A review of international importance, vegetation change and some objectives for nature conservation Biological Conservation. ,vol. 71, pp. 163- 178 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00043-P
Innes M.W. Sim, Ian A. Dillon, Mark A. Eaton, Brian Etheridge, Patrick Lindley, Helen Riley, Richard Saunders, Chris Sharpe, Matthew Tickner, Status of the Hen Harrier Circus cyaneus in the UK and Isle of Man in 2004, and a comparison with the 1988/89 and 1998 surveys Bird Study. ,vol. 54, pp. 256- 267 ,(2007) , 10.1080/00063650709461482