Controversies as informal technology assessment

作者: Arie Rip

DOI: 10.1177/107554708600800216

关键词:

摘要: Controversies, especially those that surround "early warnings" about impacts of a technology or large project, may be welcomed as an informal way assessment. This is not always recognized, because ideals consensus and context-free rationality. An alternative, rhetorical perspective presented on controversies their sociocognitive dynamics, in which interests actor-strategies play integral role besides arguments evidence. Because such interactions, articulation insights positions occurs, is, social learning. Improvement learning has to take the dynamics into account. Absolute standards methods are impossible, but one can robustness views realistic goal.

参考文章(12)
Susan M. Asch, Charles Upton Lowe, The Consensus Development Program Theory, Process, and Critique Science Communication. ,vol. 5, pp. 369- 385 ,(1984) , 10.1177/107554708400500306
Michael C. McGee, In search of ‘the people’: A rhetorical alternative Quarterly Journal of Speech. ,vol. 61, pp. 235- 249 ,(1975) , 10.1080/00335637509383289
Michael Calvin McGee, The “ideograph”: A link between rhetoric and ideology Quarterly Journal of Speech. ,vol. 66, pp. 1- 16 ,(1980) , 10.1080/00335638009383499
Ronald J. Troyer, Gerald E. Markle, Coffee Drinking: An Emerging Social Problem? Social Problems. ,vol. 31, pp. 403- 416 ,(1984) , 10.2307/800387
Josephine Gladstone, Commentary: Remarks on the Portrayal of Scientists Science, Technology, & Human Values. ,vol. 5, pp. 4- 9 ,(1980) , 10.1177/016224398000500302
Frances B. McCrea, Gerald E. Markle, The Estrogen Replacement Controversy in the USA and UK: Different Answers to the Same Question? Social Studies of Science. ,vol. 14, pp. 1- 26 ,(1984) , 10.1177/030631284014001002
H.M. Collins, Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism Social Studies of Science. ,vol. 11, pp. 3- 10 ,(1981) , 10.1177/030631278101100101
Michael E. Lynch, Technical Work and Critical Inquiry: Investigations in a Scientific Laboratory Social Studies of Science. ,vol. 12, pp. 499- 533 ,(1982) , 10.1177/030631282012004002