Multiple audit mechanism, audit quality and cost of debt: Empirical evidence from a developing country

作者: Mohamed M. El-Dyasty

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2968751

关键词:

摘要: Purpose: This study focuses on the distinctive Egyptian setting, where firms could use multiple audit mechanism voluntarily or mandatory under certain circumstances. We investigate effects quality and cost of debt. Design/methodology/approach: A sample 1699 firm-year observations listed for 2009-2019 period is used. Abnormal accruals are employed as proxies through abnormal working capital modified-Jones models. The regression method used to estimate research model after controlling firm ownership specific factors that hypothetically influence levels both debt. Findings: Results suggest joint audits not associated with quality. In contrast, dual positively leading conclude providing a high level But this result holds only in companies income decreasing discretionary accruals. These results line litigation reputational risk fears offering motivations auditors favour conservative accounting alternatives (i.e., accruals). implies opting employ have higher earnings conservatism. Our evidence also indicates choice mechanisms especially related significant increases debt, implying perceived risk. Further, decrease debt management. Originality/value: adds literature whether preference income-increasing consequently affected Together, our support view voluntary Egypt compared audits, which affect pricing important implications policymakers, investors. .

参考文章(42)
Faisal S. Alanezi, Mishari M. Alfaraih, Eyad A. Alrashaid, Saad S. Albolushi, Dual/joint auditors and the level of compliance with international financial reporting standards (IFRS‐required disclosure) Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. ,vol. 28, pp. 109- 129 ,(2012) , 10.1108/10264111211248402
Patricia M. Dechow, Amy P. Hutton, Richard G. Sloan, Detecting Earnings Management Social Science Research Network. ,(1994)
Claus Holm, Frank Thinggaard, Paying for Joint or Single Audits? The Importance of Auditor Pairings and Differences in Technology Efficiency International Journal of Auditing. ,vol. 20, pp. 1- 16 ,(2016) , 10.1111/IJAU.12050
Reiner Quick, EC Green Paper Proposals and Audit Quality Accounting in Europe. ,vol. 9, pp. 17- 38 ,(2012) , 10.1080/17449480.2012.664398
Sophie Audousset-Coulier, Audit Fees in a Joint Audit Setting European Accounting Review. ,vol. 24, pp. 347- 377 ,(2015) , 10.1080/09638180.2014.892787
Clive Lennox, Are large auditors more accurate than small auditors? Accounting and Business Research. ,vol. 29, pp. 217- 227 ,(1999) , 10.1080/00014788.1999.9729582
Linda Elizabeth DeAngelo, Auditor size and audit quality Journal of Accounting and Economics. ,vol. 3, pp. 183- 199 ,(1981) , 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
Mark E. Zmijewski, Methodological Issues Related to the Estimation of Financial Distress Prediction Models Journal of Accounting Research. ,vol. 22, pp. 59- 82 ,(1984) , 10.2307/2490859