Communication Across the Curriculum and in the Disciplines: Speaking in Engineering

作者: Deanna Dannels

DOI: 10.1080/03634520216513

关键词:

摘要: This study embraces a communication in the disciplines (CID) theoretical framework and explores meanings associated with speaking competently as an engineer. Using qualitative methodology, I analyze faculty lectures evaluations, student dress final presentations, course materials from senior design series describe emerging features of competence engineering. Results indicate five important engineering: simplicity, persuasiveness, results-oriented, numerically rich visually sophisticated-all which invoke skill translation. Ultimately, this makes contributions that suggest orality site for disciplinary knowledge construction, socialization, negotiation tension.

参考文章(59)
Yvonna S. Lincoln, Egon G. Guba, Joseph J. Pilotta, Naturalistic inquiry International Journal of Intercultural Relations. ,vol. 9, pp. 438- 439 ,(1985) , 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
George L. Grice, Michael W. Cronin, Patricia R. Palmerton, Oral Communication across the Curriculum: The State of the Art after Twenty-five Years of Experience. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration. ,vol. 29, pp. 66- 87 ,(2000)
Jack Selzer, The Composing Processes of an Engineer. College Composition and Communication. ,vol. 34, pp. 178- ,(1983) , 10.2307/357405
Elizabeth N. Kunimoto, Gary L. Kreps, Effective Communication in Multicultural Health Care Settings ,(1994)
Michael J. Ford, P. R. Myerscough, Talking with Patients: Keys to Good Communication ,(1996)
William D. Kovacs, Engineering Practice Adopt a University Civil Engineering. ,vol. 63, pp. 6- ,(1993)