Lobbying and the collective action problem: comparative evidence from enterprise surveys

作者: Benjamin Barber , Jan Pierskalla , Simon Weschle

DOI: 10.1515/BAP-2013-0036

关键词:

摘要: Industry lobbying is traditionally thought of as a non-excludable good subject to collective action problems that are most easily solved by concentrated industries. However, there very little empirical support for this hypothesis. In paper, we address major shortcoming existing work on the topic: Its near-exclusive reliance data from US. Using comparative firm-level survey up 74 countries, construct an industry-level indicator concentration and test its effect firms’ activity. multilevel Extreme Bounds Analysis Bayesian Variable Selection techniques account model uncertainty, find no evidence industry predictor We discuss implications these non-findings literature outline possible avenues further research.

参考文章(69)
Stephen Weymouth, Firm lobbying and influence in developing countries: a multilevel approach Business and Politics. ,vol. 14, pp. 1- 26 ,(2012) , 10.1515/BAP-2012-0030
Carles Boix, Democracy and redistribution ,(2003)
Beth L. Leech, Frank R. Baumgartner, David C. Kimball, Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why ,(2009)
Edward E Leamer, Sensitivity Analyses Would Help The American Economic Review. ,vol. 75, pp. 308- 313 ,(1985)
Wen Mao, Peter Zaleski, The Effect of Industry Concentration on Free Riding Review of Industrial Organization. ,vol. 19, pp. 295- 303 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1011813009129
David Coen, Wyn Grant, Graham Wilson, Political Science Perspectives on Business and Government Social Science Research Network. ,(2010)
Chris T. Volinsky, Adrian E. Raftery, David Madigan, Jennifer A. Hoeting, Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authors Statistical Science. ,vol. 14, pp. 382- 417 ,(1999) , 10.1214/SS/1009212519
Levine Ross, Renelt David, A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF CROSS-COUNTRY GROWTH REGRESSIONS The American Economic Review. ,vol. 82, pp. 942- 963 ,(1992)