A critical analysis of the implementation of service user involvement in primary care research and health service development using normalization process theory.

作者: Edel Tierney , Rachel McEvoy , Mary O'Reilly-de Brún , Tomas de Brún , Ekaterina Okonkwo

DOI: 10.1111/HEX.12237

关键词:

摘要: Background There have been recent important advances in conceptualizing and operationalizing involvement health research health-care service development. However, problems persist the field that impact on scope for meaningful to become a routine – normalized way of working primary care. In this review, we focus current practice critically interrogate factors known be relevant normalization definition, enrolment, enactment appraisal. Method Ours was multidisciplinary, interagency team, with community representation. We searched EBSCO host papers from 2007 2011 engaged an iterative, reflexive approach sampling, appraising analysing literature following principles critical interpretive synthesis using Normalization Process Theory. Findings Twenty-six were chosen 289 papers, as purposeful sample work is reported user field. Few provided clear definition involvement. The dominant identified rationale enrolling users care projects linked policy imperatives co-governance emancipatory ideals. majority methodologies employed standard services methods do not qualify users. This indicates lack congruence between stated aims methods. Most studies only positive outcomes, raising questions about balance or completeness published appraisals. Conclusion To improve care, it necessary encourage explicit reporting definitions, methodological innovation enhance dissemination processes findings.

参考文章(58)
Graham Box, Patient participation groups: the national picture. Quality in primary care. ,vol. 17, pp. 291- ,(2009)
Pat Neuwelt, Community participation in primary care: what does it mean 'in practice'? Journal of primary health care. ,vol. 4, pp. 30- 38 ,(2012) , 10.1071/HC12030
George W. Noblit, R. Dwight Hare, Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies ,(1988)
Kate Seers, Sophie Staniszewska, Sandra Herron-Marx, Carole Mockford, Jo Brett, Helen Bayliss, The PIRICOM study : a systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patients and public involvement in health and social care research University of Warwick. ,(2010)
JUSTIN JAGOSH, ANN C. MACAULAY, PIERRE PLUYE, JON SALSBERG, PAULA L. BUSH, JIM HENDERSON, ERIN SIRETT, GEOFF WONG, MARGARET CARGO, CAROL P. HERBERT, SARENA D. SEIFER, LAWRENCE W. GREEN, TRISHA GREENHALGH, Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice Milbank Quarterly. ,vol. 90, pp. 311- 346 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1468-0009.2012.00665.X
Phil Cotterell, Gwen Harlow, Carolyn Morris, Peter Beresford, Bec Hanley, Anita Sargeant, John Sitzia, Kristina Staley, Service user involvement in cancer care: the impact on service users. Health Expectations. ,vol. 14, pp. 159- 169 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1369-7625.2010.00627.X
Ed Du Vivier, Tomas De Brun, Own goals and penalties: a study of the needs of socialy excluded males in Dublin inner city Men Alone In No-man's-land. ,(2007)
Tineke A. Abma, Jacqueline E. W. Broerse, Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas Health Expectations. ,vol. 13, pp. 160- 173 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1369-7625.2009.00549.X
David Wright, Claire Foster, Ziv Amir, Jim Elliott, Roger Wilson, Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research. Health Expectations. ,vol. 13, pp. 359- 368 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1369-7625.2010.00607.X