Adaptive co-management: How social networks, deliberation and learning affect legitimacy in carnivore management

作者: Carina Lundmark , Simon Matti , Annica Sandström

DOI: 10.1007/S10344-014-0827-Y

关键词:

摘要: Adaptive co-management (ACM) is a key concept in science and an increasingly adopted policy response conservation, associated with number of positive outcomes. However, the effects mechanisms arrangements, including conditions under which ACM gives rise to higher levels internal external legitimacy, are yet be explored. This endeavor, turn, requires theoretically driven models providing assumptions outlining testable hypotheses. Considering social challenges using institutional change within Swedish carnivore management system aimed at achieving legitimacy through as illustrative example, this article develops conceptual model that encompasses possible explanations More specifically, drawing on lessons from theory, we impact three factors—social networks, deliberation learning—on resulting arrangements. Based proposed, popular outcomes can thus empirically scrutinized for increased arrangements better comprehended.

参考文章(83)
Geir Honneland, The Stories Fishermen Tell: Themes from the Barents Sea Fisheries Human Ecology. ,vol. 27, pp. 621- 626 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1018796128124
Robert Y Shapiro, Benjamin I Page, The Rational Public and Beyond Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 93- 115 ,(1999)
Stephen P. Borgatti, Martin G. Everett, Candace Jones, Network Measures of Social Capital ,(2012)
Margaret Levi, Consent, dissent, and patriotism ,(1997)
Stephen L. Elkin, Karol Edward Sołtan, Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions ,(1998)
Carl Folke, Johan Colding, Fikret Berkes, Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems Navigating Social-Ecological Systems. pp. 352- 387 ,(2001) , 10.1017/CBO9780511541957.020