Biphasic insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an evidence-based medicine review.

作者: S C L Gough , J Tibaldi

DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200727050-00002

关键词:

摘要: The efficacy benefits of biphasic insulin aspart formulation (BIAsp 30) in patients with diabetes mellitus have been reported several studies. BIAsp 30 has shown to be more effective terms glycaemic control than standard human (BHI 30). In addition gauging the treatment clinical evidence provided, it is also important evaluate strength supporting therapeutic improvements offered by 30. this paper, we evaluated available data that relate use type 2 based on a comprehensive literature review. Selected publications provided relevant were obtained via search and from manufacturer, Novo Nordisk. These graded they using Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) system following categories: (i) twice-daily versus basal insulin; (ii) other treatments; (iii) once-daily use; (iv) thrice-daily (v) combination thiazolidinediones; (vi) comparison BHI A total identified graded. For majority categories (four out six), was given an overall CEBM grade (highest quality); two (twice-daily administration) B. most studies examined, (glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA1c] reduction, proportion achieving HbA1c target <6.5% or <7%, fasting blood glucose, glucose profile and/or prandial postprandial increments). some studies, further plasma infusion rates, C-peptide levels, mean serum fructosamine hyperlipidaemia, well-being, satisfaction quality life. Safety physical laboratory investigations assessment incidence adverse events, including, many reviewed, specific evaluation those events known associated antidiabetic treatment, hypoglycaemia weight gain. Strong better without increases major nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes. Overall, gain minimal not significantly greater Thus, can confirm tolerability variety endpoints supported good body relating its different dosage regimens regimens.

参考文章(49)
D Einhorn, J Rosenstock, S Yu, K Hershon, N B Glazer, Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes: a randomised, placebo-controlled study in patients receiving stable insulin therapy. International Journal of Clinical Practice. ,vol. 56, pp. 251- 257 ,(2002)
Hannele Yki-Järvinen, Marjut Kauppila, Eila Kujansuu, Jorma Lahti, Tapani Marjanen, Leo Niskanen, Sulo Rajala, Leena Ryysy, Seppo Salo, Pentti Seppälä, Timo Tulokas, Jorma Viikari, Jukka Karjalainen, Marja-Riitta Taskinen, None, Comparison of Insulin Regimens in Patients with Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 327, pp. 1426- 1433 ,(1992) , 10.1056/NEJM199211123272005
Janet H. Silverstein, Arlen L. Rosenbloom, Shin Amemiya, Phil Zeitler, Georgeanna J Klingensmith, Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents ,(2003)
W. M. W. Bebakar, C. C. Chow, K. A. Kadir, S. Suwanwalaikorn, J. A. Vaz, O. M. Bech, , Adding biphasic insulin aspart 30 once or twice daily is more efficacious than optimizing oral antidiabetic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. ,vol. 9, pp. 724- 732 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1463-1326.2007.00743.X
Charles Kilo, Nicholas Mezitis, Rajeev Jain, James Mersey, Janet McGill, Philip Raskin, Starting patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy using once-daily injections of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30, biphasic human insulin 70/30, or NPH insulin in combination with metformin Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications. ,vol. 17, pp. 307- 313 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S1056-8727(03)00076-X
Hannele Yki-Järvinen, Comparison of Bedtime Insulin Regimens in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 130, pp. 389- 396 ,(1999) , 10.7326/0003-4819-130-5-199903020-00002
Udaya M. Kabadi, Mary Kabadi, Comparative efficacy of glimepiride and/or metformin with insulin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. ,vol. 72, pp. 265- 270 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.DIABRES.2005.10.024