Locating science in society across Europe: Clusters and consequences

作者: N. Mejlgaard , C. Bloch , L. Degn , M. W. Nielsen , T. Ravn

DOI: 10.1093/SCIPOL/SCS092

关键词:

摘要: In search of differences and similarities in relation to the role location science European societies, we use empirical information from 37 countries as a platform for developing typologies concerning dimensions society. These capture clusters reveal significant heterogeneity across Europe, providing point departure international learning, while also demonstrating challenges that institutions face their promotion Research Area, shared priorities common model Combining national-level individual-level data, further show connection between national public's satisfaction with own participants technology. where communication culture is weak, plays minor policy-making, procedures public involvement are citizens comparatively less contented Copyright The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com,

参考文章(9)
Mats Benner, Ulf Sandström, Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system Research Policy. ,vol. 29, pp. 291- 301 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00067-0
Michael Gibbons, Peter Scott, Helga Nowotny, Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty ,(2001)
N. Mejlgaard, C. Bloch, Science in Society in Europe Science and Public Policy. ,vol. 39, pp. 695- 700 ,(2012) , 10.1093/SCIPOL/SCS087
Maja Horst, Alan Irwin, Nations at Ease With Radical Knowledge: On Consensus, Consensusing and False Consensusness Social Studies of Science. ,vol. 40, pp. 105- 126 ,(2010) , 10.1177/0306312709341500
Simon Joss, Sergio Bellucci, Participatory technology assessment: European perspectives Centre for Study of Democracy, University of Westminster. ,(2002)