Aneurysm sac pressure monitoring: effect of technique on interpretation of measurements.
作者： J.W. Hinnen , M.J.T. Visser , J.H. van Bockel
DOI: 10.1016/J.EJVS.2004.11.016
关键词:
摘要: Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy measuring pressure with a fluid filled device (needle) and non-fluid (catheter) inside thrombosed aneurysmal sac after exclusion from circulation by endovascular grafting. Methods In static environment, consisting syringe which monitoring kit was connected, experiments were performed influence type (either needle or catheter) effect characteristics medium on reproducibility measurements. pressures obtained in different kinds media compared those blood. Similar using catheter. Subsequently, measurements dynamic physiological environment. This environment consisted an artificial aneurysm, constructed porcine aorta human aortic thrombus, mounted. analyzed Bland–Altman plots. Results Under conditions, levels blood, starch solution thrombus similar. identical catheter significant lower than measured blood ( P Conclusion A device, inserted into like fibrin does not yield accurate reproducible results. tip-sensor rather superior aneurysm EVAR.
core.ac.uk
elsevier.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(14)
J. Hajo Van Bockel, Pressure sensor for use in an artery ,(1997)
Sachinder Singh Hans, Olan Jareunpoon, Raywin R. Huang, Pressure measurements in closed aneurysmal sac during abdominal aortic aneurysm resection Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 34, pp. 519- 525 ,(2001) , 10.1067/MVA.2001.117328
G.W.H. Schurink, N.J. M. Aarts, J. Wilde, J.M. van Baalen, T.A.M. Chuter, L.J.Schultze Kool, J.H. van Bockel, Endoleakage after stent-graft treatment of abdominal aneurysm: Implications on pressure and imaging—an in vitro study Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 28, pp. 234- 241 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70159-4
Nuno V Dias, Krassi Ivancev, Martin Malina, Timothy Resch, Bengt Lindblad, Björn Sonesson, Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair: differences between shrinking, unchanged, and expanding aneurysms with and without endoleaks. Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 39, pp. 1229- 1235 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.JVS.2004.02.041
J. Martin Bland, DouglasG. Altman, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet. ,vol. 327, pp. 307- 310 ,(1986) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
William R. Mower, William J. Quinones, Regarding “Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure on the aneurysm wall” Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 33, pp. 660- 661 ,(2001) , 10.1067/MVA.2001.111750
Geoffrey H. White, Weiyun Yu, James May, Endoleak--a proposed new terminology to describe incomplete aneurysm exclusion by an endoluminal graft. Journal of Endovascular Surgery. ,vol. 3, pp. 124- 125 ,(1996) , 10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0124B:>2.0.CO;2
T Chuter, Canine Model of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treated by Endovascular Graft Implantation Cardiovascular Surgery. ,vol. 5, pp. 490- 496 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0967-2109(97)00057-4
G.W.H. Schurink, J.M. van Baalen, M.J.T. Visser, J.H. van Bockel, Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure on the aneurysmal wall. Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 31, pp. 501- 506 ,(2000) , 10.1067/MVA.2000.103693
Richard A. Baum, Jeffrey P. Carpenter, Michael A. Golden, Omaida C. Velazquez, Timothy W.I. Clark, S.William Stavropoulous, Constantine Cope, Ronald M. Fairman, Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 35, pp. 23- 29 ,(2002) , 10.1067/MVA.2002.121068